2016
DOI: 10.14429/dsj.66.9196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Quantitative Measures for Analysing Aircraft Handling Qualities

Abstract: <p>The ease and precision with which pilot is able to handle the designated task determines the aircraft’s handling qualities. Accordingly, the most common methodology for determining aircraft’s handling qualities is through pilot opinions or through questionnaires. These subjective means of analysis is not reliable as the sole source of judgments. Quantitative metrics to analyse the task difficulty based on pilot’s performance, supplemented with subjective decision, can provide better insight into pilot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details on these metrics is discussed in section 2.3. Proven performance-based workload analysis metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE), Pilot Inceptor workload (PIW) (Hebbar & Pashilkar, 2016) and Power frequency (Lampton & Klyde, 2012) were used to establish relation between pilot's performance and his/her physiological measures. Statistical methods such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-test were used to establish the significance of variation amongst samples.…”
Section: Areas Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on these metrics is discussed in section 2.3. Proven performance-based workload analysis metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE), Pilot Inceptor workload (PIW) (Hebbar & Pashilkar, 2016) and Power frequency (Lampton & Klyde, 2012) were used to establish relation between pilot's performance and his/her physiological measures. Statistical methods such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-test were used to establish the significance of variation amongst samples.…”
Section: Areas Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%