2017
DOI: 10.1002/mmce.21095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of principal component analysis based effective digital predistortion technique for low-cost FPGA implementation

Abstract: This article investigates the issue of low-cost digital predistortion (DPD) implementation in fixed-point field programmable gate array (FPGA) by considering the bitresolution along with lower number of coefficients. The impact of principle component analysis (PCA) on bit-resolution of DPD solution is proposed within the context of established DPD models. Unlike previously proposed PCA based solutions, it is established by simulation and measurement that the numerical stability problem associated with popular … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficients extracted while performing inverse modelling for different models in Section 4.2 at different fixed-point bitresolutions are used to generate predistorted signal for different models. Table 6 shows the DPD performances performed at different fixed-point bit (16,24, and 32) resolutions for both measurement set-ups. The 2D-HMP-PCA, and 2D-CHMP-PCA DPD have good performance at 16-bit resolution, however, the 2D-HMP-PCA model requires more number of coefficients than the 2D-CHMP-PCA model.…”
Section: Dpd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The coefficients extracted while performing inverse modelling for different models in Section 4.2 at different fixed-point bitresolutions are used to generate predistorted signal for different models. Table 6 shows the DPD performances performed at different fixed-point bit (16,24, and 32) resolutions for both measurement set-ups. The 2D-HMP-PCA, and 2D-CHMP-PCA DPD have good performance at 16-bit resolution, however, the 2D-HMP-PCA model requires more number of coefficients than the 2D-CHMP-PCA model.…”
Section: Dpd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FPGA's memory size required by a model depends on the size of observation (predistorter) matrix and bit-resolution of each sample [23,24]. Memory~size = Matrix size × Bit-sesolution (22) where matrix size = L × no .…”
Section: Dpd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After extracting the coefficients, the inverse modelling performance is evaluated in terms of normalised mean square error (NMSE) and adjacent channel error power ratio (ACEPR). NMSE is mathematically defined as [27]…”
Section: Proposed Ica Methods For Dpdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where e(n) = y meas (n) − y est (n) is the error between the measured baseband output signal y meas (n) and the estimated model output y est (n) for any sample n. ACEPR is mathematically defined as [27]…”
Section: Proposed Ica Methods For Dpdmentioning
confidence: 99%