Last decade has witnessed significant developments on the application of pressure sensitive paint technique to the measurement of surface pressure distributions on wind tunnel models. Excellent reviews on the subject may be seen in the articles by Crites (1) , Liu et al (2) , and Bell (3) et al. Notable progress has been made, particularly on aspects of data processing of PSP images and resection based methodology is known to yield enhanced accuracy of PSP results (4) .While the PSP technique has been widely used on models in transonic wind tunnels (5)(6)(7)(8) , very few applications in supersonic flow are available in literature. Earlier work on the application of PSP on highly swept wings at supersonic speeds include those of McLachlan et al (9) and Shimbo et al (10) . McLachlan et al conducted PSP tests on a high sweep oblique wing model at Mach numbers of 1·6, 1·8 and 2·0 at relatively low angles of attack (-4°to 2°). Their PSP results using an insitu calibration compared well with pressure tap data at two Mach numbers. Shimbo et al (10) applied PSP and TSP (Temperature Sensitive Paint) to a scaled supersonic experimental airplane model at Mach numbers of 1·4, 1·6, 1·8 and 2·0 at zero incidence. PSP was applied to one side of the wing and TSP to the other side. Detailed comparisons with pressure port data showed that PSP data, in general, had a shift of about 0·1 in C p towards a higher pressure direction at Mach 2·0. Application of PSP technique to different flow problems (11)(12)(13)(14) and an assessment of its accuracy has been a major focus in our laboratory. Recently the technique was successfully applied to a 3D shock-induced boundary-layer interaction at Mach 1·8 (12) . It may be noted that, in all the above investigations, image registration using algebraic transforms was adopted.
ABSTRACTExperiments have been performed documenting the pressure field on the lee-side of a delta-wing at three incidence angles (5°, 10°, and 15°) and at Mach 1·8 using a PSP (Pressure Sensitive Paint) technique. The delta-wing model having a leading edge sweep of 60°w as instrumented with 31 spanwise pressure ports at 68% of mean chord location. The Optrod-B1 binary paint was utilised and the PSP images were processed employing a resection based methodology. The comparisons of PSP results with those measured employing pressure taps show good agreement at different incidence angles.
NOMENCLATUREC p surface pressure coefficient (p-p ∞ )/q ∞ I luminescence intensity I o intensity at reference conditions I R normalised intensity ratio [I/I o ] red ÷ [I/I o ] blue (Fig. 4) L length of the model, 103mm M Freestream Mach number, 1·80 p surface pressure p ∞ freestream static pressure q ∞ freestream dynamic pressure X distance along the span, from the model centreline Y distance along the model length from the model apex a model incidence angle, deg.