2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Derivatives for Mandibular Third Molar Extraction Related Post-Operative Sequelae: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies addressed the target review question appropriately (phase #1). Among 19 meta-analyses, 12 studies [ 12 , 27 , 29 , 32 ] [ 33 ], [ 35 38 ]; [ 7 , 11 , 24 ] showed a high risk of bias regarding eligibility criteria (due to unclear restrictions regarding publication date or language and weakly described inclusion/exclusion criteria). Six studies [ 7 , 12 , 13 , 27 , 30 , 32 ] had a high risk of bias regarding the study selection process (due to lack of specified databases' searched strategy or potential risk of selection of RCTs by only one reviewer instead of 2≤ independent reviewers).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All studies addressed the target review question appropriately (phase #1). Among 19 meta-analyses, 12 studies [ 12 , 27 , 29 , 32 ] [ 33 ], [ 35 38 ]; [ 7 , 11 , 24 ] showed a high risk of bias regarding eligibility criteria (due to unclear restrictions regarding publication date or language and weakly described inclusion/exclusion criteria). Six studies [ 7 , 12 , 13 , 27 , 30 , 32 ] had a high risk of bias regarding the study selection process (due to lack of specified databases' searched strategy or potential risk of selection of RCTs by only one reviewer instead of 2≤ independent reviewers).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 19 meta-analyses, 12 studies [ 12 , 27 , 29 , 32 ] [ 33 ], [ 35 38 ]; [ 7 , 11 , 24 ] showed a high risk of bias regarding eligibility criteria (due to unclear restrictions regarding publication date or language and weakly described inclusion/exclusion criteria). Six studies [ 7 , 12 , 13 , 27 , 30 , 32 ] had a high risk of bias regarding the study selection process (due to lack of specified databases' searched strategy or potential risk of selection of RCTs by only one reviewer instead of 2≤ independent reviewers). Seven studies [ 10 ]; [ 27 , 29 , 32 , 35 , 36 , 39 ] had a high risk of bias regarding the data collection step (according to unclear efforts made to minimize errors in data collection and quality assessment).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations