2020
DOI: 10.1002/jca.21767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of PLASMIC score in prediction of ADAMTS13 deficiency in a pediatric case of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PLASMIC score discriminates between PTT and other TMA, such as atypical uremic syndrome, reliably assesses the likelihood of a severe deficit of ADAMTS13 activity in patients with TMA and could help improve the accuracy of clinical assessment and be beneficial when ADAMTS13 testing is unavailable 12,13 . Gupta et al reported that the PLASMIC score could also be a good predictor to identify pediatric patients with an ADAMTS13 activity less than 10% 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLASMIC score discriminates between PTT and other TMA, such as atypical uremic syndrome, reliably assesses the likelihood of a severe deficit of ADAMTS13 activity in patients with TMA and could help improve the accuracy of clinical assessment and be beneficial when ADAMTS13 testing is unavailable 12,13 . Gupta et al reported that the PLASMIC score could also be a good predictor to identify pediatric patients with an ADAMTS13 activity less than 10% 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLASMIC Score discriminated between PTT and other MAT, such as atypical uremic syndrome, reliably assesses the likelihood of a severe de cit of ADAMTS13 activity in patients with MAT and could help improve the accuracy of clinical assessment and be bene cial when ADAMTS13 testing is not available (11,12). Gupta et al report that PLASMIC score could also be a good predictor in children to identify patients with an ADAMTS13 activity less than 10% (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%