2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of pH, ORP, and DO monitoring to evaluate chromium(VI) removal from wastewater by the nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 , the Cr(VI) removal efficiency of M48h-Al O is very high in comparison with the other tested particles, being significantly higher when it is normalized with SSA. M48h-Al O Cr(VI) removal efficiency is within the range of the values reported for nZVI obtained from borohydride method (Fe ) at similar pH (Li et al 2008 ;Xie and Cwiertny 2012 ;Yu et al 2014 ). This can be considered as a good result: first, because Fe is known to have a higher reactivity than other commercial nZVI products (Kim et al 2012 ) and second, due to the fact that in the present case the batches were not stirred during reaction.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…7 , the Cr(VI) removal efficiency of M48h-Al O is very high in comparison with the other tested particles, being significantly higher when it is normalized with SSA. M48h-Al O Cr(VI) removal efficiency is within the range of the values reported for nZVI obtained from borohydride method (Fe ) at similar pH (Li et al 2008 ;Xie and Cwiertny 2012 ;Yu et al 2014 ). This can be considered as a good result: first, because Fe is known to have a higher reactivity than other commercial nZVI products (Kim et al 2012 ) and second, due to the fact that in the present case the batches were not stirred during reaction.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The highest reaction rate corresponds to the 25P nanoparticles, with negligible differences between the un-activated and activated particles (i.e., higher for the A 25P particles with a removal capacity of 25.8 mg Cr(VI)/g Fe(0)). Even higher reaction rates have been reported in the literature for experiments in which the batches were stirred [42], the solutions were buffered to a lower pH [22,28] or the nZVI were obtained by the borohydride reduction method [43].…”
Section: Reduction Of Cr(vi)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In Yu's case, it was found that higher pH values resulted in higher Cr(VI) removal efficiencies, which was because more OH -ions were generated when more Cr(VI) was reduced to Cr(III) by the nano zero-valent (nZVI) iron particle [21] . As the efficiency of zero-valent iron nanoparticles (ZVINs) for the Cr(VI) removal was strongly decrease due to particle agglomeration, Esfahani et.…”
Section: Application Of Nanotechnologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One the other hand, various kinds of nanomaterial also enhance the Cr(VI) reduction activity like TiO2 nanoparticles for photocatalytic reduction [10,11] . This article mainly showed newly technique for Cr(VI) removal including membrane separation [6,12,13] , photocatalytic reduction [14,15,16] , adsorption [17,18,19] , and application of nanotechnology [20,21] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%