Sustainable Disease Management in a European Context
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8780-6_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of pathogen surveys, disease nurseries and varietal resistance characteristics in an IPM approach for the control of wheat yellow rust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numbers of observed virulence and AFLP phenotypes in the eight regions were calculated. Global distributions since 2001–2002 of two particular strains, which were observed on five continents in this study, were estimated from the virulence phenotype distribution in the present data set, large‐scale pathogen surveys in eastern USA (Markell & Milus 2008), northern Europe (Hovmøller & Henriksen 2008), South Africa (Boshoff et al . 2002) and Australia (Wellings 2007), and by AFLP phenotyping of subsets of isolates from these areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numbers of observed virulence and AFLP phenotypes in the eight regions were calculated. Global distributions since 2001–2002 of two particular strains, which were observed on five continents in this study, were estimated from the virulence phenotype distribution in the present data set, large‐scale pathogen surveys in eastern USA (Markell & Milus 2008), northern Europe (Hovmøller & Henriksen 2008), South Africa (Boshoff et al . 2002) and Australia (Wellings 2007), and by AFLP phenotyping of subsets of isolates from these areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four disease susceptibility groups are defined here: 0 (resistant), 1, 2 and 3 (very susceptible). The groupings in Crop Protection Online are updated each year, thereby representing the current susceptibility of each variety to each disease as reflected by the prevalent pathogen population (Hovmøller and Henriksen 2008). In most cases, the groupings did not change during the considered field trial period [2002][2003][2004][2005].…”
Section: External Characteristics Of Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, VCU information needs to be applied together with other tools for crop protection, e.g., as in the Danish Crop Protection Online, which is based on disease and weed assessments in individual fields and considers crop phenology and previous fungicide treatments, coupled with disease resistance groupings, disease control thresholds and the risk that a particular disease is present, as estimated based on historical data (e.g. Hovmøller and Henriksen 2008).…”
Section: Model Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were inoculated on a susceptible spreader host, which was grown in between rows of Skater ( Yr2, Yr32 ) and Robigus ( Yr2, Yr32 ), which were resistant to the two wildtype isolates (Hovmøller, ). The field experiments took place in 2005 and 2006 in Denmark, where yellow rust was scarce and Yr32 resistance provided 100% disease control (Hovmøller & Henriksen, ). The virulence phenotype of the two wildtype isolates had been absent from the Danish P. striiformis population for more than 10 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%