2013
DOI: 10.1002/cem.2536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of orthogonal space regression to calibration transfer without standards

Abstract: To transfer a calibration model in cases where the standardization samples are rare or unstable, a method based on orthogonal space regression (OSR) is proposed. It uses virtual standardization spectra to account for response changes between instruments or batches. A comparative study of the proposed OSR, piecewise direct standardization, finite impulse response, orthogonal signal correction, and model updating (MU) was conducted on both pharmaceutical tablet data and chlorogenic acid data. The results of thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For recalibration using SVR and RMTL methods, selecting standardization samples through support vectors provides better results than selecting samples by the KS-algorithm. RMTL is comparable with the recently proposed orthogonal space regression (OSR), 28 when the standardization sets are both selected by the KS-algorithm. The RMSEP is 3.67 mg for RMTL while 3.64 mg for OSR.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Tablets' Datasetmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For recalibration using SVR and RMTL methods, selecting standardization samples through support vectors provides better results than selecting samples by the KS-algorithm. RMTL is comparable with the recently proposed orthogonal space regression (OSR), 28 when the standardization sets are both selected by the KS-algorithm. The RMSEP is 3.67 mg for RMTL while 3.64 mg for OSR.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Tablets' Datasetmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The transfer from instrument 1# into instrument 2# is investigated. And the number of standardization samples is set to 24, because once the number of standardization samples reaches 24, a further increase in the number of standardizations has little effect on the performance of model updating methods 28. RMSE values of the primary PLS model and SVR model calibrated on instrument 1# with all calibration samples are shown in Table…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, global models tend to require a large number of calibration samples. 1,5 Alternatively, data pre-processing, such as multiplicative signal correction, 9 finite impulse response filtering, 10 orthogonal methods, 8,11,12 generalized least squares, 13 and wavelength selection can be employed to reduce the sensitivity of the resulting model to changes in conditions. 14 A down side of these methods can be that they tend to remove variation not present in all of the different conditions (or different instruments), and so can reduce the sensitivity of the model to the analyte of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be difficult to perform calibration transfer in this way, especially when these instruments are placed in different locations. Other calibration transfer methods have been developed without using the transfer datasets from both instruments [23,24,25]. But unlike the commonly used methods, these methods have not been extensively studied and made easily available to general NIR users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%