2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.198-199.1184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Optoelectronic Liquid Lever Sensor in Urban Bridges Deflection Monitoring

Abstract: The deflection which reflects the bridge linear variety is an important parameter for the evaluation of bridge safety. According to the structural characteristics of urban bridges, the connected pipe optoelectronic liquid level sensor system is a novel kind of sensor for detecting the connected pipe liquid level, which can be applied for multipoint, long-period, online, remote, automatic measurement of bridge deflection, it is not affected by the dust, humidity and fog in the urban bridge health monitoring and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As opposed to stresses, deflections can be directly monitored in real-life settings using a variety of contact or non-contact sensors. Examples of the former are linear variable differential transformers—LVDTs and hydrostatic systems (e.g., [ 13 , 14 ]), and examples of the latter are cameras (e.g., [ 15 , 16 ]), global positioning system—GPS (e.g., [ 17 , 18 ]), laser-based sensors (e.g., [ 19 , 20 ]), and radar-based sensors (e.g., [ 21 ]). However, even though these sensors enable direct monitoring of deflections, their implementation in real-life settings faces significant challenges that render them impractical for long-term monitoring: they require stable reference points, an unobstructed line of sight, and clear targets (e.g., [ 22 , 23 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to stresses, deflections can be directly monitored in real-life settings using a variety of contact or non-contact sensors. Examples of the former are linear variable differential transformers—LVDTs and hydrostatic systems (e.g., [ 13 , 14 ]), and examples of the latter are cameras (e.g., [ 15 , 16 ]), global positioning system—GPS (e.g., [ 17 , 18 ]), laser-based sensors (e.g., [ 19 , 20 ]), and radar-based sensors (e.g., [ 21 ]). However, even though these sensors enable direct monitoring of deflections, their implementation in real-life settings faces significant challenges that render them impractical for long-term monitoring: they require stable reference points, an unobstructed line of sight, and clear targets (e.g., [ 22 , 23 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurements are performed using for example linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs), hydrostatic systems (Burdet 1993, Li et al 2012, global positioning system (Roberts et al 2004, Figurski et al 2007, radars (Gentile and Bernardini 2010), lasers (Psimoulis andStiros 2007, Fang andYunfei 2012), and cameras (Jauregui et al 2003, Tian et al 2013. The main advantages of direct deformation measurements are that they can be used on many different types of structures and no knowledge of boundary conditions is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%