2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106747
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Optimal Designs to Item Calibration

Abstract: In computerized adaptive testing (CAT), examinees are presented with various sets of items chosen from a precalibrated item pool. Consequently, the attrition speed of the items is extremely fast, and replenishing the item pool is essential. Therefore, item calibration has become a crucial concern in maintaining item banks. In this study, a two-parameter logistic model is used. We applied optimal designs and adaptive sequential analysis to solve this item calibration problem. The results indicated that the prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, an opportunity in computerized calibration is to re-estimate the item parameters from the ongoing calibration and to apply a sequential optimal design, see Lu (2014), van der Linden and Ren (2015) and Ren et al (2017). This sequential and the Bayesian (or minimax) approach can also be combined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, an opportunity in computerized calibration is to re-estimate the item parameters from the ongoing calibration and to apply a sequential optimal design, see Lu (2014), van der Linden and Ren (2015) and Ren et al (2017). This sequential and the Bayesian (or minimax) approach can also be combined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For designing the calibration part, we will apply optimal design theory, see e.g., Atkinson, Donev and Tobias (2007). The use of optimal design theory for item calibration has been discussed previously and designs have been elaborated, see e.g., Berger (1992), Buyske (2005), Lu (2014), Zheng (2014), van der Linden and Ren (2015), Ren, van der Linden and Diao (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where small values denote examinees with lower ability levels to solve the item and large values denote examinees with higher ability levels. Similar to Lu (2014), Passos and Berger (2004), and Berger, King, and Wong (2000), we assume that the experimenter is able to find examinees whose abilities match the ability levels of the optimal design. One application of the 2PL model is in computerized adaptive testing (CAT), which is a computer-based test that tailors the items to the examinee's ability.…”
Section: Bayesian D-optimal Designs For Test-item Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item pool construction requires the estimation of the information function of the items, a step that is performed using and Item Response Theory 80 (IRT), see Veldkamp (2013) for a basic description and a critique of IRT, and Lu (2014) for a description of an estimation method. The information function is then discretized into specific ability levels of interest (such as the pass/fail ability level for an examination test) that provide coefficients for the objective and/or the constraints of the combinatorial optimization model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%