2009
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2008.2004737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of NSGA-II Algorithm to Generation Expansion Planning

Abstract: This paper describes use of a multiobjective optimization method, elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm version II (NSGA-II), to the generation expansion planning (GEP) problem. The proposed model provides for decision maker choice from among the different trade-off solutions. Two different problem formulations are considered. In one formulation, the first objective is to minimize cost; the second objective is to minimize sum of normalized constraint violations. In the other formulation, the first obj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm proposed was called Genetic Algorithm for Energy Efficiency in Buildings (GAEEB) and its pseudo-code is presented in Algorithm 1. The GAEEB is based on NSGA-II (Deb, Pratap, Agarwal, & Meyarivan, 2002), which has been used to solve combinatorial problems in several areas as building retrofit (Asadi et al, 2014), optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation (Wanxing, Ke-yan, Yuan, Xiaoli, & Yunhua, 2015) and generation expansion planning (Kannan, Baskar, McCalley, & Murugan, 2009), among many others.…”
Section: A Multi-objective Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm proposed was called Genetic Algorithm for Energy Efficiency in Buildings (GAEEB) and its pseudo-code is presented in Algorithm 1. The GAEEB is based on NSGA-II (Deb, Pratap, Agarwal, & Meyarivan, 2002), which has been used to solve combinatorial problems in several areas as building retrofit (Asadi et al, 2014), optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation (Wanxing, Ke-yan, Yuan, Xiaoli, & Yunhua, 2015) and generation expansion planning (Kannan, Baskar, McCalley, & Murugan, 2009), among many others.…”
Section: A Multi-objective Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further analysis, the IHS algorithm proposed in this paper, HS from [13], PSO from [14], Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm (AFSA) from [15], Improved Ant Colony algorithm (IAC) from [16], Cross-Entropy Method (CE) [17][18][19], and two typical evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms, Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm version II (NSGA-II) [20][21][22] and Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm (MOPSO) [23][24][25], are compared in optimizing the power network planning. In the case study, 50 independent runs were made for each of the optimization methods involving 50 different initial trial solutions for each optimization method.…”
Section: Example Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactive power support is limited by the capacity of reactive compensation equipments installed (13). Reactive power curtailment may be correlated with the active power curtailment, which is modeled through (14). The tap changer setting will be optimized and can vary within the bounds given by (15).…”
Section: ) Production Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%