2020
DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v19.i2.pp600-607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of mutant particle swarm optimization for MPPT in photovoltaic system

Abstract: <span>The P –V characteristic of a photovoltaic system (PVs) is non-linear and de-pends entirely on the extreme environmental condition, thus a large amount PV energy is lost in the environment. To enhance the operating efficiency of the PVs, a maximum power point tracking (MPPT) controller is normally equipped in the system. This paper proposes a new mutant particle swarm optimization (MPSO) algorithm for tracking the maximum power point (MPP) in the PVs. The MPSO-based MPPT algorithm not only surmounts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By analogy with other work in this context, Azad et al [13] tested the validity of the INC algorithm and found that it performs well under variable weather conditions, but is still slower (on the order of 0.2 second) and has more maximum point author oscillation than the FL algorithm. Hoang and Le [18] also found that the PSO algorithm performs well, but its convergence speed is relatively slow (on the order of 0.87 second). It is clear then that the FL algorithm we have studied and implemented for the power maximization of this installation is more optimal in terms of speed, performance, accuracy and reliability than the traditional P&O algorithm we have treated as a reference, and the INC and PSO algorithms for other works we have cited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By analogy with other work in this context, Azad et al [13] tested the validity of the INC algorithm and found that it performs well under variable weather conditions, but is still slower (on the order of 0.2 second) and has more maximum point author oscillation than the FL algorithm. Hoang and Le [18] also found that the PSO algorithm performs well, but its convergence speed is relatively slow (on the order of 0.87 second). It is clear then that the FL algorithm we have studied and implemented for the power maximization of this installation is more optimal in terms of speed, performance, accuracy and reliability than the traditional P&O algorithm we have treated as a reference, and the INC and PSO algorithms for other works we have cited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A PV array is made up of multiple modules that are interconnected in a series-parallel layout, represented as a matrix with NS rows and NP columns, as illustrated in Figure 2 [23]. The PV array is mathematically defined by:…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This MPPT feature is used to track the maximum power point (MPP), where at this point, the maximum power harvesting process occurs [1]- [3]. The MPP point can be reached if the system operating voltage is set to the MPP voltage [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%