2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12594-011-0121-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of multivariate statistical techniques in the assessment of water quality in Sakarya River, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the number of physicochemical parameters, siltation depth in observed stations and cost in monitoring the network can be reduced without losing any significance of the outcome. The same aspects have also been found in similar studies [16][17][18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, the number of physicochemical parameters, siltation depth in observed stations and cost in monitoring the network can be reduced without losing any significance of the outcome. The same aspects have also been found in similar studies [16][17][18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Between the two factors, factor 1 explained 76.3% of the total variation and exhibited a high negative loading of PO 3À 4 (SRP), T-P, NH þ 4 ÀN, NO À 2 ÀN, and T-N (absolute values in the range of 0.96 to 0.99) (see Figure 5b). Because high loading values indicated a robust linear correlation between factors and parameters (Yerel and Ankara, 2012), various nutrients (i.e., SRP, T-P, NH þ 4 ÀN, NO À 2 ÀN, and T-N) were determined to be the most dominant limiting factors for the growth and biomass accumulation of M. aeruginosa. Factor 2 explained 20.7% of the total variation and exhibited a high positive loading in the N/P ratio (absolute value of 0.96) (see Figure 5b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth component had strong positive loading on biochemical oxygen demand presented 13.90 % of the total variance. The factor loadings were marked as strong (VF > 0.75), moderate (0.75 < VF > 0.5) and weak (< 0.50) corresponding to absolute varifactors values, respectively [19].…”
Section: Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%