The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8090786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Morphological and Physiological Markers for Study of Drought Tolerance in Lilium Varieties

Abstract: The shortage of water resources is an unfavourable factor that restricts the production of flowers. The use of drought-resistant morphological markers is of great significance to distinguish the drought resistance of flower varieties. In this paper, we study the difference in drought tolerance of seven common lily varieties in the flower market by morphological and physiological markers. The results showed that there were differences in leaf morphological indices and anatomical structures among the seven varie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaves are modified to reduce the transpiration rate and maximize the available water resource. Thick cuticle, high P/S ratio (palisade tissue/spongy tissue) with a thick palisade layer leading to a high rate of photosynthesis and less energy spent to transport CO 2 between stomata and chloroplast and low specific leaf area, the ratio of leaf area to dry weight, with the adaptive ability of plants in resource scarce environments are considered to be indicators of drought tolerance [50,51]. The development of trichomes and the ratio of trichome to stomata are positively correlated to water deficiency [52].…”
Section: The Mechanisms Of Abiotic Stress Tolerance In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaves are modified to reduce the transpiration rate and maximize the available water resource. Thick cuticle, high P/S ratio (palisade tissue/spongy tissue) with a thick palisade layer leading to a high rate of photosynthesis and less energy spent to transport CO 2 between stomata and chloroplast and low specific leaf area, the ratio of leaf area to dry weight, with the adaptive ability of plants in resource scarce environments are considered to be indicators of drought tolerance [50,51]. The development of trichomes and the ratio of trichome to stomata are positively correlated to water deficiency [52].…”
Section: The Mechanisms Of Abiotic Stress Tolerance In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional method for selecting drought-tolerant cultivars has entailed cultivating plants in water-stressed settings and comparing their growth and reproductive parameters to those recorded in plants in non-stressed environments. However, more recently, plant breeding efforts have switched to alternate methods of screening for stress tolerance, including the use of physiological [14][15][16][17] and biochemical markers [10,[18][19][20][21]. Amongst the biochemical indicators of stress, the most widely used are those related to photosynthetic pigments, osmolytes, oxidative stress markers and antioxidants [4,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are a great number of different criteria and indicators for evaluating drought tolerance in fruit plants. Among them, chlorophyll content and the chlorophyll stability index [19], photosynthetic activity in leaves (maximum and effective quantum yield of PSII, variable fluorescence, non-photochemical quenching) [20], leaf water regime indicators (LWC-total leaf water content, WSD-water saturation deficit and WL-water loss) [21][22][23][24], enzymatic activity [24], morphometric features (leaf length and width, leaf surface area, specific weight and specific area, leaf lamina density) [25,26], and anatomical indices (thickness of cuticle, epidermis, palisade and spongy parenchyma, palisade/spongy tissue ratio) [27][28][29] are the most used. This diversity of coefficients and characteristics associated with the drought tolerance of plants certainly allows the most objective estimation of the genotype, but it is rather labor-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%