2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Monte Carlo techniques to grain boundary structure optimization in silicon and silicon-carbide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The metastable configurations for both CSL families were obtained using a recently developed, computationally efficient, Monte Carlo grain boundary optimization technique specific to multicomponent and covalently bonded systems. 10 This protocol consists of (i) constructing a random grain boundary configuration and (ii) iteratively swapping, adding, or removing Si and C atoms in the grain boundary region. The resultant (metastable) structure is accepted or rejected according to the Metropolis criterion.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The metastable configurations for both CSL families were obtained using a recently developed, computationally efficient, Monte Carlo grain boundary optimization technique specific to multicomponent and covalently bonded systems. 10 This protocol consists of (i) constructing a random grain boundary configuration and (ii) iteratively swapping, adding, or removing Si and C atoms in the grain boundary region. The resultant (metastable) structure is accepted or rejected according to the Metropolis criterion.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant (metastable) structure is accepted or rejected according to the Metropolis criterion. Further details on the methodology used to generate the metastable grain boundary states are provided in Guziewski et al 10 As shown in Figure 1, for both CSL families, we sampled three atomic-basis sets, resulting in a distribution of metastable states comprising 30,000 grain boundaries (10,000 states per atomic basis). These three basis sets correspond to the terminating chemistries of the two crystals to form Si ↔ C (Basis 1 in Figure 1), Si ↔ Si (Basis 2 in Figure 1), and C ↔ C (Basis 3 in Figure 1) transition structures.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GB character distribution (GBCD) function λ(∆g, n) with misorientation ∆g and plane normal n statistically defines the GB character in polycrystals [46]. Additionally, considering atomic arrangements in crystals, three microscopic degrees of freedom are employed to describe grain translation at the in-planar boundary plane and at the normal GB plane [47,48]. The GB energy and properties depend on the degrees of freedom, and it is crucial to link GB energy/properties to degrees of freedom through GB engineering and design [49,50].…”
Section: Additional Gb Terminology 131 Gb Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of a specific site being operated upon is a function of the difference between its energy and CNP and those of found further from the interface within the bulk crystal. A deeper discussion of the probability functionals, and the Monte Carlo algorithm in general, is available [ 78 ].…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%