Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning: Applications of Cleaning Techniques 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815577-6.00015-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Microbial Cleaning Technology for Removal of Surface Contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BCB are usually used for stone consolidation and reinforcement [40], whereas SRB and NRB bacteria Biorestoration technologies are currently considered effective alternatives to traditional restoration methods, as reported in several studies . Biological approaches can be regarded as sustainable alternatives based on several aspects: (i) exploitation of natural "virtuous" microbial processes, as bacterial activity leads to natural release of carbon dioxide and water, so their employment can be considered environmentally friendly [36][37][38]; (ii) selection of non-pathogenic microorganisms, safe to use and without recognized hazard potential [35]; (iii) environmental safety: absence of hazardous wastes and emission, compared to chemicals methods [39]; (iv) soft intervention on artworks [35]; (v) lower or comparable cost compared to conventional methods [36].…”
Section: Bioremediation and Bioconsolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BCB are usually used for stone consolidation and reinforcement [40], whereas SRB and NRB bacteria Biorestoration technologies are currently considered effective alternatives to traditional restoration methods, as reported in several studies . Biological approaches can be regarded as sustainable alternatives based on several aspects: (i) exploitation of natural "virtuous" microbial processes, as bacterial activity leads to natural release of carbon dioxide and water, so their employment can be considered environmentally friendly [36][37][38]; (ii) selection of non-pathogenic microorganisms, safe to use and without recognized hazard potential [35]; (iii) environmental safety: absence of hazardous wastes and emission, compared to chemicals methods [39]; (iv) soft intervention on artworks [35]; (v) lower or comparable cost compared to conventional methods [36].…”
Section: Bioremediation and Bioconsolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the concentration of carbon is acceptable within the range of the typical amount of adventitious carbon contamination (40−60%). 33 The nitrogen levels were very low in the sample, which means that the accuracy of the deconvolution will be very low. Interestingly, the concentration of copper detected is relatively low (0.59%), indicating that the FeNi alloy was homogeneous.…”
Section: Xps Xps Is a Highly Sensitive Technique That Provides Inform...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the final step, the tip was subjected to a dry UV−ozone treatment (see Methods) to test the effect of a simple method to remove organic contaminants from noncarbon-based probes (e.g., metal-coated or silicon tips) . 41 The HIM image of the tip after UV−ozone treatment is shown in Figure 6f.…”
Section: Hs-afm Of Nucleoproteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%