2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of microarrays to the analysis of the inactivation status of human X-linked genes expressed in lymphocytes

Abstract: Dosage compensation in mammalian females is achieved by the random inactivation of one X chromosome early in development; however, inactivation is not complete. In addition to a majority of pseudoautosomal loci, there are genes that are expressed from both the active and the inactive X chromosomes, and which are interspersed among other genes subject to regular dosage compensation. The patterns of X-linked gene expression in different tissues are of great significance for interpreting their impact on sex diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assaying individual genes on the X is labor-intensive, and higher throughput genomic methodologies are also being utilized. Microarrays allow for the comparison of expression from many genes simultaneously, and several studies have compared X-linked expression levels between males and females (Craig et al 2004;Talebizadeh et al 2006;Johnston et al 2008). However, such an approach does ask an inherently diVerent question; so it is perhaps not surprising that microarraybased studies show inconsistent results with the hybrid data, detecting fewer escaping genes, for many possible reasons.…”
Section: Approaches To Identify Genes That Escape XCImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assaying individual genes on the X is labor-intensive, and higher throughput genomic methodologies are also being utilized. Microarrays allow for the comparison of expression from many genes simultaneously, and several studies have compared X-linked expression levels between males and females (Craig et al 2004;Talebizadeh et al 2006;Johnston et al 2008). However, such an approach does ask an inherently diVerent question; so it is perhaps not surprising that microarraybased studies show inconsistent results with the hybrid data, detecting fewer escaping genes, for many possible reasons.…”
Section: Approaches To Identify Genes That Escape XCImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Craig et al, 2004) -for the vast majority of X-linked alleles one parental set in each female cell may be expressed predominantly over the other set. This is a particularly important consideration when looking at monozygotic female (MZF) twins as the process of X-inactivation and the possibility of skewed inactivation may lead to 'identical' twins having nonidentical gene expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other more indirect approaches focus on the epigenetic modifications that differentiate active and inactive X chromosomes, namely promoter DNA methylation and histone modifications (Carrel et al 1996;Jegalian and Page 1998;Matarazzo et al 2002). In recent reports, microarray technology was used to compare the expression of a high number of X-linked genes in female and in male lymphocytes (Craig et al 2004) and in lymphoblastoid cell lines from normal males, normal females and individuals with supernumerary X chromosomes (Sudbrak et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%