2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13215602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Metal-Organic Frameworks and Covalent Organic Frameworks as (Photo)Active Material in Hybrid Photovoltaic Technologies

Abstract: Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are two innovative classes of porous coordination polymers. MOFs are three-dimensional materials made up of secondary building blocks comprised of metal ions/clusters and organic ligands whereas COFs are 2D or 3D highly porous organic solids made up by light elements (i.e., H, B, C, N, O). Both MOFs and COFs, being highly conjugated scaffolds, are very promising as photoactive materials for applications in photocatalysis and artificial phot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 241 publications
(328 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 In this regard, MOFs and COFs have been vastly employed in diverse fields, such as gas separation/adsorption, cancer therapy, biosensing, catalysts, and batteries. 3–5 Although extensive efforts have been devoted to the investigation of diverse sole MOFs and COFs, they still cannot directly realize some specific needs. For instance, most monometallic MOFs often show inferior electrochemical activity, meaning that they rarely serve as electrocatalysts for energy transfer and electrode materials for energy storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In this regard, MOFs and COFs have been vastly employed in diverse fields, such as gas separation/adsorption, cancer therapy, biosensing, catalysts, and batteries. 3–5 Although extensive efforts have been devoted to the investigation of diverse sole MOFs and COFs, they still cannot directly realize some specific needs. For instance, most monometallic MOFs often show inferior electrochemical activity, meaning that they rarely serve as electrocatalysts for energy transfer and electrode materials for energy storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, adsorption-(entrapment) and membrane (size exclusion)based purification have attracted immense research and industrial interest due to their low energy consumption as well as simple and environmentally friendly operation. Various amorphous materials such as hyper-cross-linked polymers (HCPs) [1,2], porous organic polymers (POPs) [3,4], conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs) [5][6][7], and activated carbon [8][9][10]; and crystalline materials such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [11][12][13][14] and zeolites [15][16][17][18][19], have shown excellent preliminary separation performance. Covalent organic frameworks (MOFs) [11][12][13][14] and zeolites [15][16][17][18][19], have shown excellent preliminary separation performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various amorphous materials such as hyper-cross-linked polymers (HCPs) [1,2], porous organic polymers (POPs) [3,4], conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs) [5][6][7], and activated carbon [8][9][10]; and crystalline materials such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [11][12][13][14] and zeolites [15][16][17][18][19], have shown excellent preliminary separation performance. Covalent organic frameworks (MOFs) [11][12][13][14] and zeolites [15][16][17][18][19], have shown excellent preliminary separation performance. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are a class of crystalline framework material synthesized from purely organic building blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research has recently focused on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as dye molecules due to their robustness, porosity, light-harvesting properties, thermal stability, and structural versatility. However, their insulating properties limit their usage [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In the past, Rubased complexes held the top place for the highest efficiency in DSSCs of over 11% but were overtaken first in 2014 by zinc porphyrin compounds with an efficiency of 13%, and soon afterwards in 2015, by two co-sensitized metal-free organic dyes with an efficiency of 14.30% [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%