2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-10612-6_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of MCDM Methods to Tourism Evaluation of Cultural Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature review indicates the use of research models based on multi-criteria methods to analyze tourism issues such as: transport and tourism development (Liu et al, 2013), cultural potential in tourism (Stević et al, 2019), potential of sports attractions in tourism (Yang et al, 2020), sustainable ecotourism (Chuang et al, 2013) and many others.…”
Section: Figure 1 Topology Of Multi-criteria Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review indicates the use of research models based on multi-criteria methods to analyze tourism issues such as: transport and tourism development (Liu et al, 2013), cultural potential in tourism (Stević et al, 2019), potential of sports attractions in tourism (Yang et al, 2020), sustainable ecotourism (Chuang et al, 2013) and many others.…”
Section: Figure 1 Topology Of Multi-criteria Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the papers were interested in defining an evaluation framework to support DMs in defining the most suitable solution for adaptive reuse of heritage buildings, even if the value trees developed were different, with a unique exception, [9,13], where the contributions shared the same criteria. Despite the differences detected, it was possible to draw some common features, in fact, one aspect evaluated by most of the scholars was the compatibility of the function with the building [9,13,17,[37][38][39][40][41][42], which is both a historicalcultural and functional issue, and as a result will affect also the economic dimension. Also important is the recognizability of the asset and its preservation, which could also impact the image of the city [17,33,[38][39][40][41]43,44] where it is located and the perception of the community as an icon.…”
Section: Assessment Of Cultural Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the differences detected, it was possible to draw some common features, in fact, one aspect evaluated by most of the scholars was the compatibility of the function with the building [9,13,17,[37][38][39][40][41][42], which is both a historicalcultural and functional issue, and as a result will affect also the economic dimension. Also important is the recognizability of the asset and its preservation, which could also impact the image of the city [17,33,[38][39][40][41]43,44] where it is located and the perception of the community as an icon. What deserves to be investigated is also the quality of the spaces the new function will design, and in particular the recreational one that is promoted in order to activate the participation of citizens [9,13,17,27,33,37,38,40,42,44,45].…”
Section: Assessment Of Cultural Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDM has developed many soft calculation methods to process a variety of complex data (including data from expert interviews and data from actual surveys) and provide valuable management information to support decision-makers in formulating optimal strategies [10][11][12][13]. At present, there have been some studies using MCDM to study tourism-related issues, such as surveys of service quality in tourism [14], hotel performance evaluation and selection [15], tourism development and management [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%