2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-018-01624-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of MALDI Biotyper System for Rapid Identification of Bacteria Isolated from a Fresh Produce Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Böhme et al compared the efficacy of MALDI-TOF MS (Voyager STR-DE, Applied Biosystems) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing and pointed out that MALDI-TOF MS identified 76% of 50 seafood-borne bacterial strains isolated from commercial seafood products at species level while 16S rRNA gene sequencing only identified the species of 50% of the strains [ 51 ]. Our outcomes are also consistent with the study of El-Nemr et al in which MALDI-TOF MS identified more bacteria isolated from a market area (e.g., vegetables, soil, air, and hand palms of fresh produce handlers) at species level (41%) than 16S rRNA gene sequencing (28%) did [ 21 ]. In another study, Pandey et al identified psychrotolerant bacteria isolated from high-altitude soil with only 4.92% of the isolates identified similarly by MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing [ 19 ], whereas in our case 73.81% of the isolates were identified identical.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, Böhme et al compared the efficacy of MALDI-TOF MS (Voyager STR-DE, Applied Biosystems) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing and pointed out that MALDI-TOF MS identified 76% of 50 seafood-borne bacterial strains isolated from commercial seafood products at species level while 16S rRNA gene sequencing only identified the species of 50% of the strains [ 51 ]. Our outcomes are also consistent with the study of El-Nemr et al in which MALDI-TOF MS identified more bacteria isolated from a market area (e.g., vegetables, soil, air, and hand palms of fresh produce handlers) at species level (41%) than 16S rRNA gene sequencing (28%) did [ 21 ]. In another study, Pandey et al identified psychrotolerant bacteria isolated from high-altitude soil with only 4.92% of the isolates identified similarly by MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing [ 19 ], whereas in our case 73.81% of the isolates were identified identical.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results and the findings of several other authors reassure the potential of MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Biotyper) to act as an alternative to 16S rRNA gene sequencing or in the future even replace it in environmental microbiology screening [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 50 , 51 ]. Still, to identify and thoroughly characterize the bigger, uncultivable part of the microbial community of irrigation water, culture-independent methods such as amplicon sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes are necessary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Confirmatory qPCR for S. agalactiae were performed as described previously 29 . Bacterial 16S rRNA PCR was performed as described previously 30 .…”
Section: Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique is tremendously useful for the identification of different microbial strains and their associated metabolites using either whole cells or cell extracts. The main disadvantage of MALDI‐ToF‐MS is that the technique is unable to identify new species as the detection and identification processes are conducted using existing spectral databases of the peptide mass fingerprints of strains (El‐Nemr et al, 2019; Pinu, 2016). MALDI‐ToF‐MS determines a unique proteomic fingerprint of an organism and matches characteristic patterns with an extensive reference library to determine the organism's identity (Madsen et al, 2015; Zervas et al, 2019).…”
Section: Analytical Methods For Microbial Pathogen Identification In ...mentioning
confidence: 99%