2000
DOI: 10.1176/jnp.12.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Magnetoencephalography to the Study of Autism

Abstract: Whole-head magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data were collected from a 33-year-old male who was diagnosed at 6 years of age with autism. Childhood symptoms included acquired aphasia, self-stimulatory behavior, poor Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Artic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with other studies [Hadjikhani et al, 2004; Humphreys et al, 2008; Pierce, Muller, Ambroses, Allen, & Courchesne, 2001], the cortical activation pattern for different object categories (faces, buildings, and common objects) in the autism individuals was highly irregular, relative to the typical pattern [Hasson, Harel, Levy, & Malach, 2003], with hyperactivation for the objects and hypoactivation for the face stimuli [also see Humphreys et al, 2008; Schultz et al, 2000]. Given this irregularity, identifying a functionally defined face‐ and object‐related ROI for each individual with autism could not be done reliably at a corrected threshold.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with other studies [Hadjikhani et al, 2004; Humphreys et al, 2008; Pierce, Muller, Ambroses, Allen, & Courchesne, 2001], the cortical activation pattern for different object categories (faces, buildings, and common objects) in the autism individuals was highly irregular, relative to the typical pattern [Hasson, Harel, Levy, & Malach, 2003], with hyperactivation for the objects and hypoactivation for the face stimuli [also see Humphreys et al, 2008; Schultz et al, 2000]. Given this irregularity, identifying a functionally defined face‐ and object‐related ROI for each individual with autism could not be done reliably at a corrected threshold.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This experiment was composed of 32 epochs (15 sec long) of movie clips, divided into four categories: shots of faces under various natural situations (e.g., walking in the street), navigation of the camera through a building area, navigation of the camera through open fields, and movie clips of miscellaneous images from various object categories [machines and cars; for additional information, see Hasson et al, 2004]. This task has been used successfully to evaluate cortical activity in autism [Humphreys, Hasson, Avidan, Minshew, & Behrmann, 2008].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a case report of MEG data in an autistic man further documents timing and amplitude differences (Hurley et al, 2000). This case report looked at the MEG at 100 ms latency in an autistic 33-year-old male.…”
Section: Behavioral Studiesmentioning
confidence: 80%