2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8857942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Machine Learning to Prediction of Surgical Site Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, a variety of ML models, including the support vector machine model, backward stepwise method, deep neural network, naive Bayes algorithm, Bayesian model, convolutional neural network and artificial neural network model have been used to predict SSI with an AUC ranging from .65 to .97. [13][14][15][16][17][18] However, while these models successfully predicted patients who would develop SSIs, they were not trained to discriminate between the type of SSI. Deep and organ space infections have a greater impact on patient outcome compared to superficial SSI, often require more invasive management with intravenous antibiotics, percutaneous drainage procedures, and reoperation, and may arise from a different disease process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, a variety of ML models, including the support vector machine model, backward stepwise method, deep neural network, naive Bayes algorithm, Bayesian model, convolutional neural network and artificial neural network model have been used to predict SSI with an AUC ranging from .65 to .97. [13][14][15][16][17][18] However, while these models successfully predicted patients who would develop SSIs, they were not trained to discriminate between the type of SSI. Deep and organ space infections have a greater impact on patient outcome compared to superficial SSI, often require more invasive management with intravenous antibiotics, percutaneous drainage procedures, and reoperation, and may arise from a different disease process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third strategy is to develop algorithms using artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning. 47 This would require developing large libraries of images and diagnoses to train and evaluate algorithms, but if successful, these algorithms could improve accuracy and remove the person-to-person variability of diagnoses based on image review. 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would allow comparisons between wound images from POD3 to the POD10 so that the GP can assess how the wound has progressed over time rather than at a static time point. A third strategy is to develop algorithms using artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning 47. This would require developing large libraries of images and diagnoses to train and evaluate algorithms, but if successful, these algorithms could improve accuracy and remove the person-to-person variability of diagnoses based on image review 44…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of learning algorithms aims to build a classifier from a training dataset in order to accurately predict testing samples [ 31 ]. The performance of the prediction models can be evaluated using different metrics, such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) [ 32 ]. Studies show that the AUC is more statistically discriminant than other methods when evaluating the predictive ability of the classification algorithm [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%