2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Characterization of Ischemic Stroke with MRI Images: A Review

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard tool for the diagnosis of stroke, but its manual interpretation by experts is arduous and time-consuming. Thus, there is a need for computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) models for the automatic segmentation and classification of stroke on brain MRI. The heterogeneity of stroke pathogenesis, morphology, image acquisition modalities, sequences, and intralesional tissue signal intensity, as well as lesion-to-normal tissue contrast, pose significant challenges to the develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cohort sizes were reasonably large in all five included studies and comparable to the cohort sizes in studies included in another systematic review with a focus on the potential of automated segmentation of stroke lesions in MRI images [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohort sizes were reasonably large in all five included studies and comparable to the cohort sizes in studies included in another systematic review with a focus on the potential of automated segmentation of stroke lesions in MRI images [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reviews have been conducted recently in the field of stroke management, 43 focusing on topics such as early recognition, 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 novel therapeutics, 49 , 50 , 51 comparison of thrombolytic agents, 52 combination of MT with IVT, 53 and safety and efficacy of IVT after antagonization of unfractionated heparin with protamine, 54 among others. This review critically assesses IVT versus MT within a 4.5‐h window, considering pretreatment and posttreatment NIHSS scales—an aspect overlooked in current literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%