2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42947-021-00023-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Machine Learning for Temperature Prediction in a Test Road in Alberta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed hybrid model showed an excellent prediction ability compared to others. For instance, the RF showed a 95% better accuracy than Liu et al [37], GPR showed a 99% better accuracy than Nojumi et al [38], and 96% better accuracy than Asefzadeh et al [34], and 81.8% better accuracy than GBELM. These percentages proved that the proposed hybrid algorithm model has a promising potential, high reliability and high accuracy for predicting the pavement temperature.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The proposed hybrid model showed an excellent prediction ability compared to others. For instance, the RF showed a 95% better accuracy than Liu et al [37], GPR showed a 99% better accuracy than Nojumi et al [38], and 96% better accuracy than Asefzadeh et al [34], and 81.8% better accuracy than GBELM. These percentages proved that the proposed hybrid algorithm model has a promising potential, high reliability and high accuracy for predicting the pavement temperature.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…More details about the test road and its construction can be found in previous work. 4,6,9 Thermistors and CS650 time domain reflectometers (TDRs, Campbell Scientific) were installed in the HMA, GBC, and subgrade layer to collect asphalt and soil temperature at various depths. Figure 1 shows the cross-section of the test road, along with the location of thermistors and TDRs, at depths of 0.02, 0.09, 0.17, 0.25, 0.50, 0.70, 0.80, 1.80, and 2.70 m. Identical sensors were installed at three locations for each depth to provide redundancy in the case of damage during installation or malfunctioning during operation.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 A time-related parameter, DOY, has been shown to affect the temperature of the HMA layer. 9 Thus, DOY is also included as a parameter. DOY ranges from 1 to 365, and with DOY ¼ 1 corresponding to January 1.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the meso-structure of material is too complex, it is difficult to determine the above relationship. Neural network is a powerful tool to find the relationship between various variables under complex conditions and may provide an alternative way to predict the effective thermal conductivity of composite construction materials based on their specific heterogeneous structures [30]. Lee et al [31] and Sargam et al [32] developed neural network models to predict the effective thermal conductivity of concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%