1982
DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800290407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of level crossing analysis to discrete state processes in queueing systems

Abstract: In this paper we introduce a discrete state level crossing analysis and present some basic results and a key theorem of level crossings. We illustrate the fertility of the discrete state level crossing analysis by applying it to queueing systems with (i) bulk arrival, (ii) instantaneous feedback, (iii) limited waiting space, and (iv) to machine interference problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system performance measures were numerically evaluated using an algorithmic approach proposed by Neuts [9] and a discrete state level crossing analysis (see [11]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system performance measures were numerically evaluated using an algorithmic approach proposed by Neuts [9] and a discrete state level crossing analysis (see [11]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: Define In steady state, let IVLt and iVb be the total number of steps in the arrival and departure processes, respectively, over a given,long period of time. Using the level crossing method due to Foster and Perera [10] or Shanthikumqr and Chandra [17], in the steady state, the nurnber of times a given level is crossed in the arrlval process can differ at most by one from the number of times it is crossed in the departure or service process, i.e. It is the product of the p.a.e.…”
Section: This Is Explainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthennore, Eqs. (65a) and (65b) can be derived directly using the discrete state-level crossing analysis (e.g., see [25] for a detailed discussion on discrete state-level crossing analysis). Let Q(r) be the number of "phases" in the system at time r. Each customer on its arrival brings a number of phases distributed according to g. Each phase requires an exponentially distributed service with mean 1 /p.…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lemma now follows from Eqs (23). and(25). The closure property of BHP distribution under convolution now easily follows from Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%