1992
DOI: 10.1109/36.175324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Kalman filtering to real-time preprocessing of geophysical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to most existing filtering methods, Kalman filters are well suited to work with variable sampling intervals, as demonstrated for two-state models in SABATINI (1995). Also, their computational complexity is compatible with real-time requirements in most applications (NoRIEGA and PASUPATHY, 1992;CORRADIN~ et al, 1993;SABATINI, 1995) incurred by working with a centred method of computing finite differences (two-sample lag when the median smoother is inserted) is the modest price paid in a change for its superiority over the backward methods, in terms of either truncation error levels (PRESS et al, 1992) or measurement noise magnification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast to most existing filtering methods, Kalman filters are well suited to work with variable sampling intervals, as demonstrated for two-state models in SABATINI (1995). Also, their computational complexity is compatible with real-time requirements in most applications (NoRIEGA and PASUPATHY, 1992;CORRADIN~ et al, 1993;SABATINI, 1995) incurred by working with a centred method of computing finite differences (two-sample lag when the median smoother is inserted) is the modest price paid in a change for its superiority over the backward methods, in terms of either truncation error levels (PRESS et al, 1992) or measurement noise magnification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…computer visual systems), or when the observations are not always available (GPS position data), it is still possible to use a Kalman Filter considering that while new observations are not available, only the prediction phase will be executed; i.e. estimation phase is not executed until new observed data are available [6]. The same procedure can be adopted when observations or measurements are not reliable [6].…”
Section: Execution Monitoring Applied To Data Estimation Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…estimation phase is not executed until new observed data are available [6]. The same procedure can be adopted when observations or measurements are not reliable [6]. So, detecting sensor measurement faults (i.e.…”
Section: Execution Monitoring Applied To Data Estimation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comparison is performed by the "Decision When a fault is detected, the "Decision signalizes the "Estimation" block that observation vector is not reliable. In this cas phase of the α-β Filter is not executed, an obtained in the output of the prediction phase the output vector of parameters [5] [16].…”
Section: The Fault-tolerant Estimation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17) Combining (16) and (17) the optimal values of the α-β parameters may be explicitly obtained in terms of Λ, by:…”
Section: The Fault-tolerant Estimation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%