2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2021.165850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Kalman filtering technique for evaluation of neutron cross section data of 100Mo (n, 2n) 99Mo reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, hyper parameters σ 2 f and λ had been calculated by maximizing the log marginal function [17,18] which resulted in the problem of overfitting. Therefore, to avoid this, λ has been calculated by considering the chi-square test (χ 2 ) [4]. The chi-square test (χ 2 ) is minimum for λ ranging from 0.27 to 0.3 whereas χ 2 is maximum for λ at 0.19001 (calculated by maximizing log marginal function).…”
Section: Gaussian Process Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, hyper parameters σ 2 f and λ had been calculated by maximizing the log marginal function [17,18] which resulted in the problem of overfitting. Therefore, to avoid this, λ has been calculated by considering the chi-square test (χ 2 ) [4]. The chi-square test (χ 2 ) is minimum for λ ranging from 0.27 to 0.3 whereas χ 2 is maximum for λ at 0.19001 (calculated by maximizing log marginal function).…”
Section: Gaussian Process Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3] two regression methods such as logistic regression and random forest regression methods have been used to highlight measurement features that are common among many of the outlier data points. In [4], experimental cross-section data of 100 Mo (n,2n) 99 Mo have regressed using Ridge, Lasso regression methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 [7]. The renormalized cross-section values are calculated as per the procedure given in [8]. In this study, two attributes, namely the half-life of sample and monitor cross section, have been chosen and updated to determine the renormalized cross section value as these were the two attributes provided by the experimenters in their research papers.…”
Section: Renormalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%