2019
DOI: 10.4236/am.2019.103012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Iterative Approaches in Modeling the Efficiency of ARIMA-GARCH Processes in the Presence of Outliers

Abstract: The study explored both Box and Jenkins, and iterative outlier detection procedures in determining the efficiency of ARIMA-GARCH-type models in the presence of outliers using the daily closing share price returns series of four prominent banks in Nigeria (Skye (Polaris) bank, Sterling bank, Unity bank and Zenith bank) from January 3, 2006 to November 24, 2016. The series consists of 2690 observations for each bank. The data were obtained from the Nigerian Stock Exchange. Unconditional variance and kurtosis coe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E( ) = 0 and variance 1. In practice, is often assumed to follow the standard normal or a standardized student-t distribution while is the standardized residual term that follows autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (ARCH(q)), generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (GARCH (q, p)), exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (EGARCH(q,p)) and Glosten, Jagannathan and Runkle generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (GJR-GARCH(q,p)) models in (5), (6), (7) and (8), respectively.…”
Section: Standard Garch-type Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E( ) = 0 and variance 1. In practice, is often assumed to follow the standard normal or a standardized student-t distribution while is the standardized residual term that follows autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (ARCH(q)), generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (GARCH (q, p)), exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (EGARCH(q,p)) and Glosten, Jagannathan and Runkle generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (GJR-GARCH(q,p)) models in (5), (6), (7) and (8), respectively.…”
Section: Standard Garch-type Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, neglecting heteroscedasticity can lead to spurious non-linearity in the conditional mean and difficulty in computing the confidence interval for forecasts (see [2,3,4,5]). Furthermore, details of heteroscedasticity modeling are documented in [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%