2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of item response theory to quantify substance use disorder severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should include these variables as outcomes whenever possible. Using an SUD scale (e.g., Kirisci et al, 2006) may also improve the generalizability of these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future research should include these variables as outcomes whenever possible. Using an SUD scale (e.g., Kirisci et al, 2006) may also improve the generalizability of these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The number of drugs tried has been hypothesized to be a precursor for the later development of drug use disorders (Robins & Przybeck, 1991). Finally, recent research conducted to create a substance use disorder (SUD) severity scale using item response theory found that SUD severity significantly predicted the number of different drugs tried by the age of 19, which the authors used as a test of construct and concurrent validity for their SUD scale (Kirisci et al, 2006).…”
Section: Outcome Variable-drug Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the prevalence of each symptom in groups defined by early age at first use younger than 15 years, male gender, and presence of childhood conduct disorder and comparison of the prevalence of that symptom with the prevalence in its corresponding group (age at first use ≥15 years, female gender, and absence of childhood conduct disorder) was performed using contingency tables and calculating Fisher p values. second, we performed eFa and iRt analyses following procedures used previously in other iRt analyses of substance-use disorder symptoms (agrawal and lynskey, 2007;compton et al, 2009;Kirisci et al, 2006;Krueger et al, 2004;langenbucher et al, 2004;lynskey and agrawal, 2007;saha et al, 2006teesson et al, 2002). eFa was used to evaluate if the nine cuD symptoms were dominated by a single common factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the case of AUD, studies indicate that DSM-IV AUD criteria do not provide support for the distinction between alcohol abuse and dependence (Langenbucher et al, 2004;Martin et al, 1996) and that DSM-IV AUD criteria are indicators of a unidimensional latent trait (Gelhorn et al, 2007;Harford et al, 2009;Kirisci et al, 2006;Saha et al, 2006). Interpretation of DSM-IV AUD is further complicated by both conceptual and measurement issues (Gelhorn et al, 2008;Harford et al, 2010;Hasin & Paykin, 1998, 1999Schuckit et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%