1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199706)18:8<1004::aid-jcc4>3.3.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of inverse iteration to 2‐dimensional master equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of other treatments are also available. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] We focus on the limiting low pressure rate constant k 0 . It is of particular interest partly because it describes the maximum effect of the collisions and partly because it is simpler to treat than the rate constant at higher pressures, where a solution of the complete master equation would have been necessary.…”
Section: A General Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of other treatments are also available. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] We focus on the limiting low pressure rate constant k 0 . It is of particular interest partly because it describes the maximum effect of the collisions and partly because it is simpler to treat than the rate constant at higher pressures, where a solution of the complete master equation would have been necessary.…”
Section: A General Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a tagged A is followed in time in its progress to form AB, and if a tagged A in AB is followed in time in its progress to form A + B, beginning with an equilibrium concentrations of AB for the given A and B concentration, the sum of the tagged distribution functions at any energy E is equal to the equilibrium distribution at that E. Thus, to solve the problem, one can either begin with a tagged A or a tagged AB. To simplify the comparison with earlier work, [46][47][48][49][50] we begin with AB and use the result to calculate also the rate of recombination A + B → AB. We consider the reaction in the low pressure regime…”
Section: A General Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While solving the diffusion version of the ME is clearly an approximation to the solution of the full ME, this approximation has proved useful. 6,7,16,[32][33][34][35] One of the keys to the scalability of the methods presented in the current work is the inversion of the diffusion approximation matrix. As described elsewhere, 6,7 rearranging the ordering of the energy grains within the state space p to bring grains of the same energy together results in a banded matrix with the bandwidth equal to the number of isomers being modeled, p. A banded matrix of this type can be factorized with computational effort scaling at O(np 2 ), a vast improvement over the O(n 3 ) standard solve as usually p Ӷn.…”
Section: ͑2͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2DME includes a kernel for collisional energy transfer transitions that depends on both variables. Although such treatments were first demonstrated decades ago [39][40][41][42][43] and exist in improved forms today, [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] they require input parameters that involve extensive additional calculations. 47 Instead of an explicit 2DME, most practical ME calculations utilize various methods for reducing the 2DME to one dimension.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%