Abstract:The life of metal forming dies, and the efficiency of tooling industries depends on the mechanical and wear properties of tool steel. These properties can be further improved by depositing the ceramic coating on heat-treated tool steel. There are many coating materials available with numerous excellent properties. But problem is how to select the best coating material. Compared to various studies related to material selection problems in the contrasting area of utilization, remarkably, few research work is don… Show more
The rapid growth in information technology (IT) and the implementation of IT tools has aided hospitals in delivering healthcare at an unprecedented pace. However, without the proper knowledge and understanding of software tools, healthcare establishments may find it difficult to select the best hospital management system software solution for their business. In this paper, a problem based on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is modelled to identify the best hospital management software on the basis of a thorough analysis of every aspect of the healthcare needs and required software competencies, so that hospitals can select a robust hospital management software system. This article presents an extended MCDM method for estimating and selecting robust hospital management system alternatives using the Pythagorean fuzzy method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) and stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). To do this, the objective weights and subjective weights are assessed by the MEREC and SWARA models, and the measurement alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method determines the order of preference of the alternatives on the basis of the Pythagorean fuzzy set. Moreover, after in-depth analysis of every aspect of healthcare needs and required software competencies in India, the proposed method is designed to identify the best hospital management software tool, so that the hospital can choose a robust hospital management system. Comparative discussion is presented to exhibit the rationality and sustainability of the established approach to prioritize hospital management software options.
The rapid growth in information technology (IT) and the implementation of IT tools has aided hospitals in delivering healthcare at an unprecedented pace. However, without the proper knowledge and understanding of software tools, healthcare establishments may find it difficult to select the best hospital management system software solution for their business. In this paper, a problem based on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is modelled to identify the best hospital management software on the basis of a thorough analysis of every aspect of the healthcare needs and required software competencies, so that hospitals can select a robust hospital management software system. This article presents an extended MCDM method for estimating and selecting robust hospital management system alternatives using the Pythagorean fuzzy method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) and stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). To do this, the objective weights and subjective weights are assessed by the MEREC and SWARA models, and the measurement alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method determines the order of preference of the alternatives on the basis of the Pythagorean fuzzy set. Moreover, after in-depth analysis of every aspect of healthcare needs and required software competencies in India, the proposed method is designed to identify the best hospital management software tool, so that the hospital can choose a robust hospital management system. Comparative discussion is presented to exhibit the rationality and sustainability of the established approach to prioritize hospital management software options.
Decision support systems are being developed as attractive tools to help organizations make better decisions. These systems assist decision-makers in making the best decisions. The widespread application of the internet has transformed the development of decision support systems into a web-based challenge. On the other hand, project selection has always been a significant issue for organizations. The limitation of resources and the existence of different criteria while selecting projects cause organizations to face the challenges of multiple-criteria decision making. In this research, a new approach is introduced for the selection of criteria. It also presents a new web-based decision support system for selecting projects considering uncertainty and various criteria, including organizational strategies, the seventh edition of project management standard, and sustainable development. Therefore, the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development were included as project evaluation indicators. The proposed approach was developed using Pythagorean fuzzy sets, MEREC, and MARCOS methods to examine uncertainty and solution methods. In this approach, a new version of the MARCOS method was developed, with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for rankings. Also, a new development was presented using the Pythagorean fuzzy (PF)-MEREC method, which was used for weighting. The effectiveness of the proposed method is discussed through a real case study conducted on one of the mineral holdings in Iran. Among the mining projects introduced to the company, finally, the second project was selected. In the comparison made using PF-Entropy-TOPSIS and PF-Entropy-VIKOR methods, the superior project provided similar results. By changing the weights of the criteria for four different types of states, sensitivity analysis was used to determine the reliability of the final rankings. In these states, the weights of the criteria were moved together or assigned equal weights, and, in all four states, the ranking results were the same.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.