2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Individualization and Differentiation in Czech Primary Schools-one of the Characteristic Features of Inclusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers separate the concepts of DI and individualised instruction, and emphasise that the latter term means adapting learning goals and content to the abilities of individual children with special needs by creating separate individualised education programmes (IEP) for them (Landrum and McDuffie 2010), whereas DI is considered an academically responsive approach that creates opportunities for all children to learn (see Raveaud 2005;Stollman et al 2019;Tomlinson 2014). Others view these concepts as identical, and some consider differentiation as a narrower concept within individualisation (Kratochvílová and Havel 2013;Landrum and McDuffie 2010). In this study, DI is understood as a general concept, covering teachers' positive understanding of diversity and belief in all students' potential as well as their commitment to certain pedagogical principles, such as community building, flexible curricula, teaching up, varying group practices and ongoing assessment.…”
Section: Defining DImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some researchers separate the concepts of DI and individualised instruction, and emphasise that the latter term means adapting learning goals and content to the abilities of individual children with special needs by creating separate individualised education programmes (IEP) for them (Landrum and McDuffie 2010), whereas DI is considered an academically responsive approach that creates opportunities for all children to learn (see Raveaud 2005;Stollman et al 2019;Tomlinson 2014). Others view these concepts as identical, and some consider differentiation as a narrower concept within individualisation (Kratochvílová and Havel 2013;Landrum and McDuffie 2010). In this study, DI is understood as a general concept, covering teachers' positive understanding of diversity and belief in all students' potential as well as their commitment to certain pedagogical principles, such as community building, flexible curricula, teaching up, varying group practices and ongoing assessment.…”
Section: Defining DImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Differentiation and individualisation are designed to lead to a simultaneous motivation of all students to master individual tasks and achieve goals (Tomlinson 2014;Coubergs et al 2017). In line with this, Kratochvílová and Havel (2013) outline the application of differentiated and individualised teaching approaches as a significant feature of inclusive education. Although these practices require a systematic implementation approach, inclusive practices are in some instances performed unconsciously in an unplanned way (Chan et al 2002;Yuen, Westwood, & Wong, 2005).…”
Section: Differentiation and Individualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In corroborating, the systematic literature review of Lindner and Schwab (in press) acknowledged that collaboration and co‐teaching, grouping, modification (e.g., of assessment, content, extent, instruction, learning environment, material), motivation and feedback, and individualised student support were all characteristics of inclusive education. Among these characteristics/aspects/domains, two specific aspects seem to be common among most definitions: course individualisation (e.g., taking students’ individual achievements, feelings and/or interests into perspective; e.g., Jordan, Glenn, and McGhie‐Richmond, 2010; Jordan, Schwartz, and McGhie‐Richmond, 2009; Kratochvílová and Havel, 2013) and the use of differentiated instruction (e.g., Connor and Cavendish, 2018; Coubergs, Stryven, Vanthournout, and Engels, 2017; Shogren et al, 2015; Suprayogi, Valcke, and Godwin, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%