2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-022-00932-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of improved support vector machine in geochemical lithology identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, ANN depends on the network topology, initial weights and thresholds (Saporetti et al 2021), thus requiring a large number of parameters during the training process, thousands of iterations leading to a slow convergence rate and a tendency to fall into local minima in case of more local minima, with subsequent uncertainty in the output results. SVM uses a kernel function to map data into high-dimensional space and builds a hyperplane based on training data to classify complex lithology, Yin et al (2023) proposed an affiliation-weighted one-toone SVM method for lithology identification, which is better for lithology classification in small samples or when the data are unbalanced. Lu et al (2022) proposed a gray wolf optimized SVM lithology identification method, which showed strong adaptability in complex reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, ANN depends on the network topology, initial weights and thresholds (Saporetti et al 2021), thus requiring a large number of parameters during the training process, thousands of iterations leading to a slow convergence rate and a tendency to fall into local minima in case of more local minima, with subsequent uncertainty in the output results. SVM uses a kernel function to map data into high-dimensional space and builds a hyperplane based on training data to classify complex lithology, Yin et al (2023) proposed an affiliation-weighted one-toone SVM method for lithology identification, which is better for lithology classification in small samples or when the data are unbalanced. Lu et al (2022) proposed a gray wolf optimized SVM lithology identification method, which showed strong adaptability in complex reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lithological classification information is important and basic for mineral resource exploration and geological disaster monitoring. Understanding the spatial distribution characteristics and variability of surface lithology is of great significance for regional geological mapping and mineral resource potential prediction in areas with high altitudes and poor transportation [1][2][3][4]. Traditional lithological mapping involves aerial photo examination and mapping based on interpretation keys, examination of the rocks in the field, rock sampling, and their examination in the laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the methodology of identifying lithology or lithofacies of carbonate rocks using well logs mainly includes the qualitative analysis of curve characteristics, crossplot method, apparent rock fabric number (ARFN) method, and relevant mathematical analysis methods [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Qualitative analyses identify lithofacies according to well log response features, curve shape, values of well logs, and imaging characteristics of different rocks [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are also some lithofacies or lithology identification methods based on machine-learning techniques and mathematical algorithms, such as neural network [19], cluster analysis [20], principal component analysis [21], grey correlation [22], support vector machine [23], and Naive Bayesian method [24]. The key to these methods is to build a well-trained and suitable model which can be applied to well log measurements from wells with poor core data to predict lithofacies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%