2015
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of high‐throughput mini‐bioreactor system for systematic scale‐down modeling, process characterization, and control strategy development

Abstract: High-throughput systems and processes have typically been targeted for process development and optimization in the bioprocessing industry. For process characterization, bench scale bioreactors have been the system of choice. Due to the need for performing different process conditions for multiple process parameters, the process characterization studies typically span several months and are considered time and resource intensive. In this study, we have shown the application of a high-throughput mini-bioreactor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies that consider the operating conditions of larger‐scale bioreactors in high‐throughput screening systems are reported in the literature. For instance, Janakiraman, Kwiatkowski, Kshirsagar, Ryll, and Huang () matched the volumetric aeration rates (vvm) between parallel ambr15 TM cultivations of CHO cells and a 15,000‐L production‐scale bioreactor, whereas Velez‐Suberbie et al () used the power per unit volume (P/V) as a scale‐down criterion to compare ambr15f cultivations of E. coli with 20‐L bioreactor cultivations. Other works involving high‐throughput cultivations in complex integrated facilities have also been reported (see recent review in Hemmerich, Noack, Wiechert, & Oldiges, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies that consider the operating conditions of larger‐scale bioreactors in high‐throughput screening systems are reported in the literature. For instance, Janakiraman, Kwiatkowski, Kshirsagar, Ryll, and Huang () matched the volumetric aeration rates (vvm) between parallel ambr15 TM cultivations of CHO cells and a 15,000‐L production‐scale bioreactor, whereas Velez‐Suberbie et al () used the power per unit volume (P/V) as a scale‐down criterion to compare ambr15f cultivations of E. coli with 20‐L bioreactor cultivations. Other works involving high‐throughput cultivations in complex integrated facilities have also been reported (see recent review in Hemmerich, Noack, Wiechert, & Oldiges, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concern over the lack of control of process parameters during screening led to significant interest in the use of microbioreactors to enable assessment of clones under controlled pH and DO conditions for better screening outcomes 60,61 . Simcell was among the first microbioreactor to be commercially available with culture volumes of less than a millilitre 62 .…”
Section: Strategies For High and Medium Throughput Clone Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ambr15 system allows reasonable throughput (24–48 parallel vessels) and low liquid handling volumes, high automatization, and little need for manual user interventions. It has been used to perform DoE (Design of Experiments) studies in fed‐batch mode, to compare a fed‐batch CHO process performed in an ambr system to bench‐top bioreactor and shake flasks and to successfully predict the performance of 3, 15, and 200 L as well as 15,000 L manufacturing scale cultures. These studies show that a good alignment between the ambr system and larger scale bioreactors can be achieved in a fed batch mode with respect to cell growth, productivity, and product quality even though some physical characteristics of the ambr system differ from production‐scale equipment .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%