Application of group model building in implementation research: A systematic review of the public health and healthcare literature

Abstract

Background Group model building is a process of engaging stakeholders in a participatory modeling process to elicit their perceptions of a problem and explore concepts regarding the origin, contributing factors, and potential solutions or interventions to a complex issue. Recently, it has emerged as a novel method for tackling complex, long-standing public health issues that traditional intervention models and frameworks cannot fully address. However, the extent to which group model building has resulted in the adoption of evidence-based practices, interventions, and policies for public health remains largely unstudied. The goal of this systematic review was to examine the public health and healthcare applications of GMB in the literature and outline how it has been used to foster implementation and dissemination of evidence-based interventions. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and other databases through August 2022 for studies related to public health or health care where GMB was cited as a main methodology. We did not eliminate studies based on language, location, or date of publication. Three reviewers independently extracted data on GMB session characteristics, model attributes, and dissemination formats and content. Results Seventy-two studies were included in the final review. Majority of GMB activities were in the fields of nutrition (n = 19, 26.4%), health care administration (n = 15, 20.8%), and environmental health (n = 12, 16.7%), and were conducted in the United States (n = 29, 40.3%) and Australia (n = 7, 9.7%). Twenty-three (31.9%) studies reported that GMB influenced implementation through policy change, intervention development, and community action plans; less than a third reported dissemination of the model outside journal publication. GMB was reported to have increased insight, facilitated consensus, and fostered communication among stakeholders. Conclusions GMB is associated with tangible benefits to participants, including increased community engagement and development of systems solutions. Transdisciplinary stakeholder involvement and more rigorous evaluation and dissemination of GMB activities are recommended.

Tailored vs. General COVID-19 prevention for adults with mental disabilities residing in group homes: a randomized controlled effectiveness-implementation trial

“…Of note, over 90% of the TBP GHs received all four components of the implementation strategy, providing additional support for acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness. Our collaborative infrastructure of stakeholder workgroups, previously described [ 33 ], further contributes to existing evidence of the benefits of stakeholder engaged, co-designed implementation strategies in delivering evidence-based interventions to populations living with mental disabilities [ 50 – 52 ].…”

Using qualitative system dynamics modeling to understand overdose bystander behavior in the context of Connecticut’s Good Samaritan Laws and identify effective policy options

“…Group model building (GMB) is a participatory approach to SD modeling, which has been used to study a variety of complex social issues, including health disparities, structural racism, stigma, and opioid use [ 27 – 30 ]. Typical GMB programs bring together community members, experts, and other stakeholders to work together with modeling facilitators to build a shared understanding of the forces and feedback processes that explain a complex, dynamic problem [ 25 , 31 , 32 ]. SD modeling comprises a set of methodologies that are designed to facilitate understanding of the structure and behavior of complex systems and can be leveraged to design policies for effective and sustained systems change [ 33 ].…”