2019
DOI: 10.3398/064.079.0404
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Ground-Based Lidar and Gap Intercept Measurements to Quantify a Shrub Configuration Metric within Greater Sage-Grouse Nesting Habitat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas reptile studies were conducted in the rainforest [24], agroecosystem [79], or inland and coastal waters [51], amphibian studies were restricted to seasonal ponds within temperate forests (N = 3). Five studies corresponding to four taxonomic groups were conducted in arid and semiarid ecosystems: birds [80], BLF [30], reptiles [47], and invertebrates [15,57].…”
Section: Geographic Distribution Taxonomic Groups and Ecosystems Surveyedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas reptile studies were conducted in the rainforest [24], agroecosystem [79], or inland and coastal waters [51], amphibian studies were restricted to seasonal ponds within temperate forests (N = 3). Five studies corresponding to four taxonomic groups were conducted in arid and semiarid ecosystems: birds [80], BLF [30], reptiles [47], and invertebrates [15,57].…”
Section: Geographic Distribution Taxonomic Groups and Ecosystems Surveyedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only four studies used LiDAR data from space sensors, specifically the publicly available Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) onboard the ICE, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat), and available from 2003 to 2009. Four articles acquired LiDAR data from TLS: DTMs [15,86]; canopy structural metrics [38] and shrub canopy structure [80]. According to our query, we did not record any study using UAS (drones).…”
Section: Lidar Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The datasets for this study are a part of data collected by Zabihi et al, (2019), who investigated the spatial configurations of shrub and non-shrub gaps within 3D augmented scales, a different approach, and objectives than ours. We randomly selected 10 sites from 58 formerly identified sites (GPS-recorded locations; Zabihi et al, 2019) within the two habitats (five sites in each habitat) to measure vegetation characteristics using line-transect surveys.…”
Section: Line-transect Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a linear point spacing of less than 2 cm at a 1000 m distance (Optech Inc., 2012). We acquired laser returns of each 2 × 8 m 2 plot from four roughly opposite directions using the multi-scan approach, intending to capture all dimensions of the shrubs, minimizing shrub occlusion and distance effects (Zabihi et al, 2019). Three tripods were placed around the plots as benchmarks (Figure 2), and both first and last laser returns were collected at 5-6 mm pointspacing from all scan directions.…”
Section: Terrestrial Lidar Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two species rely on sagebrush wholly for occupancy and reproduction and for about 50% of their diet in summer and up to 100% in winter . However, they select specific sagebrush species for nesting (Severson et al, 2017;Zabihi et al, 2019) and feeding, and even select within species for specific concentrations of phytochemicals . Therefore, procuring better ways to measure and monitor these complex and diverse phenotypes, specifically chemotypes, remains paramount to successful management of these threatened herbivores.…”
Section: General Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%