2000
DOI: 10.2118/00-07-das
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Geostatistics for Reservoir Characterization-Accomplishments and Challenges

Abstract: Geostatistics has been used to improve the reservoir characterization process for the last fifteen years. This article briefly discusses the accomplishments so far, and discusses the future challenges. What Is a Reservoir Characterization Process? Reservoir characterization is a process of integrating various qualities and quantities of data in a consistent manner to describe reservoir properties of interest at inter well locations. Appropriate weight should … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kelkar (2000). Yarus and Chambers (2006) provided an overview for application of geostatistics for reservoir characterization.…”
Section: Variogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kelkar (2000). Yarus and Chambers (2006) provided an overview for application of geostatistics for reservoir characterization.…”
Section: Variogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a method that is based on two criteria of minimization of variance and unbiased condition [14]. Kriging is the best linear unbiased estimator, with the exception of the Simple Kriging technique [15]. This estimator, defined as:…”
Section: Krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties involved in the reservoir description may include the permeability, porosity, saturation, thickness, faults and fractures, rock facies and rock characteristics [1]. The reservoir characterization gives a proper global reservoir prediction of these diverse reservoir properties as a function of special based on the limited local information, which could be generally understood as a process to describe the reservoir heterogeneity and solve the upscaling problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow units data was described at different well locations by analyzing several geological cross sections throughout the field, including top and thickness, porosity, permeability (in log form) from cores and logs. There are totally ten flow unit data which are ordered from the top to bottom of the reservoir and each of them has overall gross thickness ranging from 46 -85 ft with the mean of 65 ft. Flow units one, two and eight to ten are located at the top and bottom of the reservoir which are less productive, while flow unit three to seven are in the middle of the reservoir, which are most productive and provide best petrophysical properties [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%