Application of Geographic Modeling Techniques to Quantify Spatial Access to Health Services Before and After an Acute Cardiac Event

Abstract

Background Access to cardiac services is essential for appropriate implementation of evidence-based therapies to improve outcomes. The Cardiac Accessibility and Remoteness Index for Australia (Cardiac ARIA) aimed to derive an objective, geographic measure reflecting access to cardiac services. Methods and Results An expert panel defined an evidence-based clinical pathway. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), the team developed a numeric/alphabetic index at 2 points along the continuum of care. The acute category (numeric) measured the time from the emergency call to arrival at an appropriate medical facility via road ambulance. The aftercare category (alphabetic) measured access to 4 basic services (family doctor, pharmacy, cardiac rehabilitation, and pathology services) when a patient returned to his or her community. The numeric index ranged from 1 (access to principal referral center with cardiac catheterization service ≤1 hour) to 8 (no ambulance service, >3 hours to medical facility, air transport required). The alphabetic index ranged from A (all 4 services available within a 1-hour drive-time) to E (no services available within 1 hour). The panel found that 13.9 million Australians (71%) resided within Cardiac ARIA 1A locations (hospital with cardiac catheterization laboratory and all aftercare within 1 hour). Those outside Cardiac 1A were overrepresented by people >65 years of age (32%) and indigenous people (60%). Conclusions The Cardiac ARIA index demonstrated substantial inequity in access to cardiac services in Australia. This methodology can be used to inform cardiology health service planning and could be applied to other common disease states within other regions of the world.

Nurse-Led Care of Heart Failure: Will it Work in Remote Settings?

“…As highlighted by the recently published description of CARDIAC-ARIA [8], an objective, geographic measure to quantify access to Australian cardiac services, around two thirds of all Australians have ready access to all acute and aftercare services. However, around 6 million people (of whom 60% are Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and 32% aged ≥65 years) reside in less accessible regions of Australia where there is a clear mismatch between levels of chronic disease and accessible health care services.…”

Characteristics of Early and Late Adopting Hospitals Providing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Taiwan

“…Second, we used the crow‐fly distance instead of road distance or drive time between the population and the nearest PCI hospitals as a proxy measure of PCI accessibility, which might generate results that are different from approaches that use actual transportation time as the basis of measurement, which is important for treatment of patients with AMI. However, the transport time to a PCI facility can be affected by many other factors, such as traffic, time of the day, and other factors, which vary considerably …”

Growth in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Capacity Relative to Population and Disease Prevalence

“…21 This distance provides roughly the number of straight‐distance miles between patient populations and PCI facilities and is useful since it standardizes distances in miles for access comparisons, versus converting into units of measures such as driving time which has the potential for significant variability.…”