2009 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ISPACS) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ispacs.2009.5383775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of genetic multi-step search to unsupervised design of morphological filters for noise removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dMSXF can be constructed by introducing a problem-specific neighborhood structure and a distance measure and it has been shown to perform well for solving combinatorial optimization problems, particularly on problems for which the landscape is an AR(1) [3] (see Appendix). In our previous work, the landscape of the objective function used for the design of morphological filter was experimentally shown to be similar to AR(1) landscape, and we showed that dMSXF could design more effective filters than that of a conventional crossover [8].…”
Section: B Deterministic Multi-step Crossover Fusionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…dMSXF can be constructed by introducing a problem-specific neighborhood structure and a distance measure and it has been shown to perform well for solving combinatorial optimization problems, particularly on problems for which the landscape is an AR(1) [3] (see Appendix). In our previous work, the landscape of the objective function used for the design of morphological filter was experimentally shown to be similar to AR(1) landscape, and we showed that dMSXF could design more effective filters than that of a conventional crossover [8].…”
Section: B Deterministic Multi-step Crossover Fusionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In our previous work, GA was applied to an unsupervised design of morphological filters [7] based on the opening operation for noise removal in texture images, and we adopted dMSXF as a crossover method [8]. Opening is a typical morphological operation, which composes the resultant image object by arranging a structuring element (SE) inside a target object and removes residual regions that are too small to hold the SE inside.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main difference of these procedures is that the MSXF determines the transition in the local search by Metropolis criterion while dMSXF advances the local search in a deterministic rule. MSXF and dMSXF are defined in a problem-independent manner, and have been successfully applied to various combinatorial optimization problems [10], [11], [12] since the incorporation of local searches into GAs is essential in order to adjust the structural details of solutions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%