2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to select the optimal heating facility for Korean horticulture and stockbreeding sectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the semi-quantitative methods that won't to determine land suitability for surface irrigation is named AHP. AHP may be a structured tool that helps to research di cult decisions supported mathematics and psychology (Cho et al 2015;Nguyen et al 2015;Saaty 2000). during this study, a pairwise comparison matrix was conducted using excel to supply weights for every parameter or criteria considering Saaty's ranking scale (Luu et al 2018;Saaty 2008).…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) and Pairwise Comparison Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the semi-quantitative methods that won't to determine land suitability for surface irrigation is named AHP. AHP may be a structured tool that helps to research di cult decisions supported mathematics and psychology (Cho et al 2015;Nguyen et al 2015;Saaty 2000). during this study, a pairwise comparison matrix was conducted using excel to supply weights for every parameter or criteria considering Saaty's ranking scale (Luu et al 2018;Saaty 2008).…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) and Pairwise Comparison Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AHP is one of the qualitative methods used to determine the relationship between flood factor class and flood occurrence. The AHP method is a structured tool that is used to analyze difficult decisions based on the mathematics and psychology (Cho et al, 2015;Nguyen et al, 2015;Saaty, 2000;Zhang et al, 2016). To produce weighting factors, the pairwise comparison method was used by considered Saaty's ranking scale (Luu et al, 2018;Saaty, 2008).…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assign the weights of indicators, as group judgments are more valid than individual judgments, decisions from a structured group of individuals on the weights of indicators will be more accurate [36]. To have a scientific result, according to the widely-used Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method in multiple criteria decision making, a group of experts were invited for deciding the weights of each indicator [37][38][39]. In this study, ten experts in eight related fields participated, including four researchers, a CEO, an investor, and two senior government officials (see Table 2).…”
Section: Weighting Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%