“…Examination of the literature has shown that the following generalisations can be made: (i) in simple S-N tests on cross-weld samples, the fatigue performance of friction stir butt welds is typically less good than that of the parent material tested under the same conditions. 327,328 Many studies have found that after milling the top surface, the fatigue performance of 2014, 6013 and 7475 FSW joints approached that of the parent alloys, [329][330][331] yet in other studies 332 the properties remain significantly below parent material benchmarks (ii) the fatigue performance of friction stir butt welds generally comfortably exceeds that of comparable fusion welds, 93,226,330,331,333,334 a trend reported for many alloy grades (iii) failure is normally (but not always) associated with an initiation event at the geometric stress concentration at the side of the weld on the upper surface; 335 where this has been machined away, failure normally initiates in the region of lowest strength. For many alloy groups, these two locations are very close together (iv) residual stresses can play a significant role in the fatigue behaviour 191,[336][337][338] and vary according to crack test geometry.…”