2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19061373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Fresnel Zone Plate Focused Beam to Optimized Sensor Design for Pulse-Echo Harmonic Generation Measurements

Abstract: In nonlinear acoustic measurements involving reflection from the stress-free boundary, the pulse-echo method could not be used because such a boundary is known to destructively change the second harmonic generation (SHG) process. The use of a focusing acoustic beam, however, can improve SHG after reflection from the specimen boundary, and nonlinear pulse-echo methods can be implemented as a practical means of measuring the acoustic nonlinear parameter (β) of solid specimens. This paper investigates the optimal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, FZP structures serve as refractive lenses. There are two distinct variations of Fresnel Zone Plates (FZPs) based on the contribution of the concentric rings at the focal point, namely Phase FZP (PFZP, also referred to as multilevel diffractive lens) and Amplitude FZP (AFZP) [39][40][41][42][43]. PFZPs are commonly favoured in various applications because of their higher diffraction efficiency compared to amplitude-type diffractive lenses.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, FZP structures serve as refractive lenses. There are two distinct variations of Fresnel Zone Plates (FZPs) based on the contribution of the concentric rings at the focal point, namely Phase FZP (PFZP, also referred to as multilevel diffractive lens) and Amplitude FZP (AFZP) [39][40][41][42][43]. PFZPs are commonly favoured in various applications because of their higher diffraction efficiency compared to amplitude-type diffractive lenses.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%