2000
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of fluorescence-based semi-automated AFLP analysis in barley and wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This obviously led to high error rates during scoring. These results are supported by the observations of Schwarz et al (2000), showing greater inter-gel differences in the band size of identical samples than intra-gel differences for fluorescence-based semi-automated AFLP analysis in barley and wheat. Sneath and Sokal (1973) noted the usefulness of testing the significance of the difference between similarity coefficients.…”
Section: Error Estimationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This obviously led to high error rates during scoring. These results are supported by the observations of Schwarz et al (2000), showing greater inter-gel differences in the band size of identical samples than intra-gel differences for fluorescence-based semi-automated AFLP analysis in barley and wheat. Sneath and Sokal (1973) noted the usefulness of testing the significance of the difference between similarity coefficients.…”
Section: Error Estimationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) marker analysis was performed using fluorescent labeled primers essentially as described by Schwarz et al (2000), with the following modifications. The adaptor sequences were: 5′-CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC-3′, 3′-CTGACGCATGGTTAA-5′ (EcoRI adaptors), 5′-GACGATG-AGTCCTGA-3′, 3′-TACTCAGGACTCAT-5′ (MseI adaptors).…”
Section: Aflp Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods recently have been shown to provide higher resolution than conventional radio-detection techniques (Schwarz et al 2000). For multi-fluorophore fragment analysis (multiplexing), EcoRI (or PstI) primers were labeled with either 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM) or 4,7,2′,7′-tetrachloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (TET), and the MseI primer was unlabeled.…”
Section: Multi-fluorophore Aflp Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%