Application of field-portable geophysical and geochemical methods for tracing the Mesozoic-Cenozoic vein-type fluorite deposits in shallow overburden areas: A case from the Wuliji’Oboo deposit, Inner Mongolia, NE China

Geobody estimation by Bhattacharyya method utilizing nonlinear inverse modeling of magnetic data in Baba-Ali iron deposit, NW Iran

“…Their thickness varies from a few millimeters to a few centimeters along magnetite cracks. The most prevalent iron mineral in the deposit is magnetite; although, due to supergene and oxidation processes, local magnetite has been martitized along fractures and grain boundaries [ 43 , [89] , [90] , [91] , [92] , [93] , [94] ].

Fig.

…”

Estimation of Depth, Physical Parameters, and Location Using Nonlinear Inverse Modeling of Magnetic Data by Bhattacharya Method in a Field of NW Iran

“…They vary in thickness from a few millimeters to a few centimeters along cracks of magnetite. Magnetite is the most dominant iron mineral in the deposit; although, due to the effects of oxidation and supergene processes, local magnetite has been martitized along grain boundaries and fractures [46,[94][95][96][97][98][99].…”

Integrated geophysical investigation for lead and zinc mineralization in Wase, middle Benue Trough, Nigeria

“…VLF-EM has restricted probing depth capabilities, depending on the resistivity of the rocks and how they react to shallow bodies ( Watson et al., 2001 ; Zou et al., 2022 ). Considering this, the magnetic method was used to make up for the VLF-limitations, as EM are easily affected by cultural noise.…”