2018
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of EST-SSR markers developed from the transcriptome of Torreya grandis (Taxaceae), a threatened nut-yielding conifer tree

Abstract: Torreya grandis (Taxaceae) is an ancient conifer species endemic to southeast China. Because of its nutrient-rich and delicious seeds, this species has been utilized for centuries by the Chinese. However, transcriptome data and transcriptome-derived microsatellite markers for population genetics studies are still insufficient for understanding of this species’ genetic basis. In this study, a transcriptome from T. grandis leaves was generated using Illumina sequencing. A total of 69,920 unigenes were generated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
15
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The AAG/CTT (1,382, 6.38%) motif was the most abundant of the tri-nucleotide repeats, followed by AGG/CCT (1,346, 6.16%). This result might be common in conifer species, including Glyptostrobus pensilis (Li et al, 2019), Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr (Dong et al, 2018), and Torreya grandis (Zeng et al, 2018). Among the di-nucleotide repeats, AT/AT (1377, 6.31%) was the most dominant motif, which was consistent with studies in Cephalotaxus hainanensis (Qiao et al, 2014) and Pinus koraiensis (Li et al, 2020), but not in Pennisetum purpureum (Zhou et al, 2018), Liquidambar formosana (Chen et al, 2020), and Rhododendron arboretum (Sharma et al, 2020).…”
Section: Characterization Of Microsatellites In P Chienii Transcriptomesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AAG/CTT (1,382, 6.38%) motif was the most abundant of the tri-nucleotide repeats, followed by AGG/CCT (1,346, 6.16%). This result might be common in conifer species, including Glyptostrobus pensilis (Li et al, 2019), Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr (Dong et al, 2018), and Torreya grandis (Zeng et al, 2018). Among the di-nucleotide repeats, AT/AT (1377, 6.31%) was the most dominant motif, which was consistent with studies in Cephalotaxus hainanensis (Qiao et al, 2014) and Pinus koraiensis (Li et al, 2020), but not in Pennisetum purpureum (Zhou et al, 2018), Liquidambar formosana (Chen et al, 2020), and Rhododendron arboretum (Sharma et al, 2020).…”
Section: Characterization Of Microsatellites In P Chienii Transcriptomesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Among of them, only 77 (20.53%) produced clear bands with expected size. This low amplification success rate (20.53%) was comparable to that reported in some conifer species, such as Abies alba (24%) (Postolache et al, 2014), Torreya grandis (29.25%) (Zeng et al, 2018), and Pinus koraiensis (32%) (Li et al, 2020). There were two main reasons for the low success rate of amplification in P. chienii.…”
Section: Validation Of Microsatellite Markerssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…More than half of the unigenes can be successfully annotated through seven databases (Nr, Nt, KOG, Swiss-Prot, Pfam, KO, and GO), of which 490 were simultaneously identified ( Table 1 ). Most of the annotated unigenes were unique in A. argotaenia compared to its closely related conifer Torreya grandis (Zeng et al, 2018). Moreover, the annotated results of NR database indicated that A. argotaenia exhibited only 27.5% unigene identity to another conifer Picea sitchensis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, markers with PIC> 0.5 are defined as highly polymorphic [ 40 ]. In our case, the average PIC value of the 13 EST-SSR markers used, except LaES18 and LaES27, was 0.654, higher than many EST-SSR markers developed from transcriptome sequences, such as for Torreya grandis (0.357) [ 41 ], Mucuna pruriens (0.24) [ 42 ] and Lagerstroemia spp (0.589) [ 43 ]. The high PIC values observed in our work hinted a high efficiency of these set of markers in genetic analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%