2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of epifluorescence light microscopy (EFLM) to study the microstructure of wheat dough: a comparison with confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control sample and the sample with BFS at 4.81/100 and GFs at 5.07/100 g addition was analyzed by using EFLM and they were prepared and processed according to Peighambardoust et al (2010), Codinȃ and Mironeasa (2013), Mironeasa et al (2016). The samples were stained in a solution of 0.5/100 g fluorsceine and 1/100 g rhodamine B in 2-methoxyethanol for at least 1 h. Fluorescein will preferentially stain starch and rhodamine B will preferentially stain proteins.…”
Section: Epifluorescence Light Microscopy (Eflm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The control sample and the sample with BFS at 4.81/100 and GFs at 5.07/100 g addition was analyzed by using EFLM and they were prepared and processed according to Peighambardoust et al (2010), Codinȃ and Mironeasa (2013), Mironeasa et al (2016). The samples were stained in a solution of 0.5/100 g fluorsceine and 1/100 g rhodamine B in 2-methoxyethanol for at least 1 h. Fluorescein will preferentially stain starch and rhodamine B will preferentially stain proteins.…”
Section: Epifluorescence Light Microscopy (Eflm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a, b the high fluorescent intensity in starch granules is due to the main affinity of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) with starch which can be non-covalently labeled. Rhodamine B may also present affinity with starch granules, but it shows more affinity with proteins and in a protein-starch system (like dough) labeling the protein by non-covalent bindings (Peighambardoust et al 2010). The two different microstructure of dough samples (the control one and those with the BFs 4.81/100 and GFs = 5.07/100 g addition) were Images A1 and B1; 1 9 1 mm, bars 50 lm are higher magnification images of a, b; 2 9 2 mm, bars 100 lm at position indicated by the squares (color figure online) confirmed by EFLM images.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon prolonged mixing, the gluten protein sheets get dispersed, and partial disaggregation or even depolymerisation may occur [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Microstructural studies have indeed established that during mixing the gluten proteins undergo significant morphological changes [28,29,30,31]. Whereas disaggregation would only require the breakage of non-covalent bonds (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a more comprehensive understanding of food structures from micro down to nano (i.e., macromolecular) scale has been attained by the complementary use of different types of microscopies. In addition to more conventional ones, i.e., LMs e bright field and polarized LM, fluorescence microscopy, CLSM (Dufour, 2011;El-Bakry & Sheehan, 2014;Sheen, Bao, & Cooke, 2008;van de Velde, van Riel, & Tromp, 2002), EFLM (Peighambardoust, Dadpour, & Dokouhaki, 2010) e and EMs e SEM and TEM (El-Bakry & Sheehan, 2014), cryo-SEM and cryo-TEM, STEM, ESEM and ASEM, EDX spectroscopy and microanalysis (Gatti, Tossini, Gambarelli, Montanari, & Capitani, 2009;B. James, 2009), also SPM techniques -AFM, SNOM, STM (Liu & Cheng, 2011;H.…”
Section: Scanning Probe Microscopy Based Techniques For Nanoscale Chamentioning
confidence: 99%