Abstract:Over the years data assimilation methods have been developed to obtain estimations of uncertain model parameters by taking into account a few observations of a model state. The most reliable methods of MCMC are computationally expensive. Sequential ensemble methods such as ensemble Kalman filers and particle filters provide a favourable alternative. However, Ensemble Kalman Filter has an assumption of Gaussianity. Ensemble Transform Particle Filter does not have this assumption and has proven to be highly bene… Show more
“…1 a and b and as it has been reported in the literature, e.g. [28,29]. When uncertainty is in both permeability and boundary conditions, we investigate methods performance for two numerical setups.…”
Section: Data Assimilation Without Localizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hence, one has to decrease the number of degrees of freedom, i.e. by distancebased localization of [27,28] abbreviated here LETPF. Assume we have a numerical grid of N × N size with grid cells denoted by X l for l = 1, .…”
Section: Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has a localized version. In [28], we have employed the method to an inverse problem of uncertain permeability. We have shown that though localization makes the ensemble transform particle filter deteriorates a posterior estimation of the leading modes, it makes the method applicable to highdimensional problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This groundwater model was first used as benchmark for inverse modelling in [11]. It has been used as a test model for the identification of parameters, for example with iterative regularization methods [20], an ensemble Kalman approach [4], and in our previous work with particle filtering [28,29]. In this paper in addition to uncertain log permeability defined as a Gaussian process, we assume an error in boundary conditions that is non-Gaussian distributed.…”
In this paper, we focus on parameter estimation for an elliptic inverse problem. We consider a 2D steady-state singlephase Darcy flow model, where permeability and boundary conditions are uncertain. Permeability is parameterized by the Karhunen-Loeve expansion and thus assumed to be Gaussian distributed. We employ two ensemble-based data assimilation methods: ensemble Kalman filter and ensemble transform particle filter. The formal one approximates mean and variance of a Gaussian probability function by means of an ensemble. The latter one transforms ensemble members to approximate any posterior probability function. Ensemble Kalman filter considered here is employed with regularization and localization-R(L)EnKF. Ensemble transform particle filter is also employed with a form of regularization called tempering and localization-T(L)ETPF. Regularization is required for highly non-linear problems, where prior is updated to posterior via a sequence of intermediate probability measures. Localization is required for small ensemble sizes to remove spurious correlations. We have shown that REnKF outperforms TETPF. We have shown that localization improves estimations of both REnKF and TETPF. In numerical experiments when uncertainty is only in permeability, TLETPF outperforms RLEnKF. When uncertainty is both in permeability and in boundary conditions, TLETPF outperforms RLEnKF only for a large ensemble size 1000. Furthermore, when uncertainty is both in permeability and in boundary conditions but we do not account for error in boundary conditions in data assimilation, RLEnKF outperforms TLETPF.
“…1 a and b and as it has been reported in the literature, e.g. [28,29]. When uncertainty is in both permeability and boundary conditions, we investigate methods performance for two numerical setups.…”
Section: Data Assimilation Without Localizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hence, one has to decrease the number of degrees of freedom, i.e. by distancebased localization of [27,28] abbreviated here LETPF. Assume we have a numerical grid of N × N size with grid cells denoted by X l for l = 1, .…”
Section: Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has a localized version. In [28], we have employed the method to an inverse problem of uncertain permeability. We have shown that though localization makes the ensemble transform particle filter deteriorates a posterior estimation of the leading modes, it makes the method applicable to highdimensional problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This groundwater model was first used as benchmark for inverse modelling in [11]. It has been used as a test model for the identification of parameters, for example with iterative regularization methods [20], an ensemble Kalman approach [4], and in our previous work with particle filtering [28,29]. In this paper in addition to uncertain log permeability defined as a Gaussian process, we assume an error in boundary conditions that is non-Gaussian distributed.…”
In this paper, we focus on parameter estimation for an elliptic inverse problem. We consider a 2D steady-state singlephase Darcy flow model, where permeability and boundary conditions are uncertain. Permeability is parameterized by the Karhunen-Loeve expansion and thus assumed to be Gaussian distributed. We employ two ensemble-based data assimilation methods: ensemble Kalman filter and ensemble transform particle filter. The formal one approximates mean and variance of a Gaussian probability function by means of an ensemble. The latter one transforms ensemble members to approximate any posterior probability function. Ensemble Kalman filter considered here is employed with regularization and localization-R(L)EnKF. Ensemble transform particle filter is also employed with a form of regularization called tempering and localization-T(L)ETPF. Regularization is required for highly non-linear problems, where prior is updated to posterior via a sequence of intermediate probability measures. Localization is required for small ensemble sizes to remove spurious correlations. We have shown that REnKF outperforms TETPF. We have shown that localization improves estimations of both REnKF and TETPF. In numerical experiments when uncertainty is only in permeability, TLETPF outperforms RLEnKF. When uncertainty is both in permeability and in boundary conditions, TLETPF outperforms RLEnKF only for a large ensemble size 1000. Furthermore, when uncertainty is both in permeability and in boundary conditions but we do not account for error in boundary conditions in data assimilation, RLEnKF outperforms TLETPF.
“…It also has a localized version. In [26], we have employed the method to an inverse problem of uncertain permeability. We have shown that though localization makes the ensemble transform particle filter deteriorate a posterior estimation of the leading modes, it makes the method applicable to high-dimensional problems.…”
In this paper, we trivially extend Tempered (Localized) Ensemble Transform Particle Filter-T(L)ETPF-to account for model error. We examine T(L)ETPF performance for non-additive model error in a low-dimensional and a high-dimensional test problem. The former one is a nonlinear toy model, where uncertain parameters are non-Gaussian distributed but model error is Gaussian distributed. The latter one is a steady-state single-phase Darcy flow model, where uncertain parameters are Gaussian distributed but model error is non-Gaussian distributed. The source of model error in the Darcy flow problem is uncertain boundary conditions. We comapare T(L)ETPF to a Regularized (Localized) Ensemble Kalman Filter-R(L)EnKF. We show that T(L)ETPF outperforms R(L)EnKF for both the low-dimensional and the high-dimensional problem. This holds even when ensemble size of TLETPF is 100 while ensemble size of R(L)EnKF is greater than 6000. As a side note, we show that TLETPF takes less iterations than TETPF, which decreases computational costs; while RLEnKF takes more iterations than REnKF, which incerases computational costs. This is due to an influence of localization on a tempering and a regularizing parameter.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.