1974
DOI: 10.1021/ic50137a040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis to the study of ambidentate binding in sulfoxide complexes

Abstract: A reliable method for determining the mode of binding of ambidentate sulfoxide ligands to metals has been developed based upon a novel application of ESCA. Relative differences between S 2p3/, and O Is ionization potentials show a characteristic separation for oxygen-bound and sulfur-bound sulfoxides.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case, as compared to a noninteracting molecule, an increase in the binding energy of the donating atom is expected. On these bases, in an early paper, Su and Faller measured the difference between the O 1s and S 2p binding energies, Δ E b , for several metal–DMSO complexes, attempting to determine from this quantity whether the metal–molecule bonding occurred through the oxygen atom, the sulfur atom, or both. This method was adopted to rationalize the XPS data for the adsorption of DMSO on Au(100) and Pt(111), , where bi- and monodentate configurations have been found, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, as compared to a noninteracting molecule, an increase in the binding energy of the donating atom is expected. On these bases, in an early paper, Su and Faller measured the difference between the O 1s and S 2p binding energies, Δ E b , for several metal–DMSO complexes, attempting to determine from this quantity whether the metal–molecule bonding occurred through the oxygen atom, the sulfur atom, or both. This method was adopted to rationalize the XPS data for the adsorption of DMSO on Au(100) and Pt(111), , where bi- and monodentate configurations have been found, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The O 1s spectrum of nanoparticles produced in deoxygenated water (blue circles) demonstrates an appearance of a peak at 531 eV, which can be assigned to OH À groups. 44,45 However, when the nanoparticles are produced by fragmentation in air-saturated water (red circles), the O 1s spectrum is dominated by a peak at 533.6 eV, which corresponds to SiO 2 conguration. 46,47 Thus, our tests show that the thickness of the SiO 2 shell for Si nanoparticles can be controlled by varying the concentration of dissolved molecular oxygen in water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1B presents S 2p spectrum of PEO/PEG‐3LGPS which includes the characteristic peaks of SP, SGe from LGPS and that of SC, SN, SO assigned to LiTFSI. [ 30–34 ] Figure 1C shows Si 2p spectrum and two components appear: one at low binding energy around 102.1 eV related to Si–C which is the result of reaction between CMTS and PEG, another at higher binding energy about 103.2 eV related to Si–S which is also detected in S 2p spectrum (Figure 1B) and provides a strong proof of reaction between CMTS and LGPS. [ 35–37 ] That is to say, LGPS and PEG is becoming a unified whole linked by the chemical bonds that formed by reacting with CTMS.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%