2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The maxima of temperature at each height were 2191. 16 The area of temperature distribution at 1 m high was the widest, showing that the facilities and devices in this region are most affected by heat. In addition, centered on the melting temperature of iron, 1811 K, the temperature distribution form and size were minutely segmented, as shown in Figures 9 and 10.…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The maxima of temperature at each height were 2191. 16 The area of temperature distribution at 1 m high was the widest, showing that the facilities and devices in this region are most affected by heat. In addition, centered on the melting temperature of iron, 1811 K, the temperature distribution form and size were minutely segmented, as shown in Figures 9 and 10.…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Schiller et al [117] recently published a review of such social-material network studies. Of particular interest to a retrofitting framework is vulnerability issues which may result from developing interdependent networks, similar to the disaster related domino effect [118] physical proximately already entails [119]. Vulnerability and resilience has been studied in IS networks using network analysis and cascading failure models to understand inter-company impact [120][121][122][123].…”
Section: Multiple Type Exchangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of Cozzani et al [44] , Antonioni et al [45] developed the Aripar-GIS software for risk recomposition. The results evidenced that quantitative risk assessment of escalation hazard was fundamental important for identifying critical equipment and addressing prevention and protection actions.…”
Section: Quantitative Risk Assessment Of Domino Accidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%