Abstract:Guanaco (Lama guanicoe) is a protected and widely distributed ungulate in South America. A poacher, after killing guanacos in Valle Chacabuco, Chilean Patagonia, transported and stored the meat. Samples were retrieved by local police but the suspect argued that the meat was from a horse. Mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (774 pb), 15 loci microsatellites, and SRY gene were used to identify the species, number of animals and their population origin, and the sex of the animals, respectively. Analysis revealed that… Show more
“…El análisis de ADN forense permitió identificar la caza furtiva, el comercio ilegal y el contrabando ilegal de especies amenazadas, entre otros delitos (Iyengar 2014). En lo que respecta a mamíferos neotropicales, se usan distintos marcadores moleculares para identificar carne de guanaco (Lama glama), venado de las pampas (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) y carpincho (H. hydrochaeris) producto de la caza furtiva (Marín et al 2009;Sanches et al 2012). …”
R������.Si bien todos los seres vivos modifican su entorno, nuestra especie ha adquirido la capacidad de hacerlo a una escala espacio-temporal superlativa. Como resultado de la industrialización y del uso de nuevas tecnologías, el impacto antrópico ha ido en aumento en los últimos siglos, lo que causó la disminución de los tamaños poblacionales o la extinción de numerosas poblaciones silvestres. En este sentido, desde el campo de la genética de la conservación, en las últimas décadas se realizaron diversos esfuerzos para aportar conocimientos nuevos que contribuyan a la conservación de poblaciones, especies y hábitats. Las propiedades de los distintos marcadores moleculares han permitido estudiar la variabilidad genética de las especies y cómo esa variabilidad se estructura en las poblaciones y define las llamadas Unidades de Manejo, que son unidades genéticas cuyo nombre deriva de actividades extractivistas. En este artículo revisamos y analizamos críticamente los esfuerzos científicos en el área de la genética de la conservación realizados entre 2006 y 2015 en pos de la conservación de los mamíferos del Neotrópico. También criticamos el concepto de Unidad de Manejo y analizamos las perspectivas a futuro en el campo de la genética de la conservación de los mamíferos neotropicales.[Palabras clave: biología de la conservación, fauna neotropical, especies amenazadas, marcadores moleculares]
A�������. Contributions of conservation genetics to the study of neotropical mammals: review and critical analysis.Although all living beings modify their environment, our species has acquired the ability to do so on a superlative space-time scale. As a result of industrialization and the use of new technologies, the anthropic impact has been increasing in the last centuries, causing the decrease in population sizes or the extinction of numerous wild populations. In this sense, from the field of conservation genetics, diverse efforts have been made in the last decades in order to provide new knowledge that contributes to the conservation of populations, species and habitats. The properties of the different molecular markers have allowed studying the genetic variability of the species and how it is structured in the populations, defining the so-called Management Units, genetic units whose name derives from extractivist activities. In this article we perform a review and critical analysis of the scientific efforts in the area of conservation genetics carried out between the years 2006 and 2015 for the conservation of mammals of the Neotropics, criticize the concept of Management Unit and analyze future perspectives in the field of conservation genetics of neotropical mammals.
“…El análisis de ADN forense permitió identificar la caza furtiva, el comercio ilegal y el contrabando ilegal de especies amenazadas, entre otros delitos (Iyengar 2014). En lo que respecta a mamíferos neotropicales, se usan distintos marcadores moleculares para identificar carne de guanaco (Lama glama), venado de las pampas (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) y carpincho (H. hydrochaeris) producto de la caza furtiva (Marín et al 2009;Sanches et al 2012). …”
R������.Si bien todos los seres vivos modifican su entorno, nuestra especie ha adquirido la capacidad de hacerlo a una escala espacio-temporal superlativa. Como resultado de la industrialización y del uso de nuevas tecnologías, el impacto antrópico ha ido en aumento en los últimos siglos, lo que causó la disminución de los tamaños poblacionales o la extinción de numerosas poblaciones silvestres. En este sentido, desde el campo de la genética de la conservación, en las últimas décadas se realizaron diversos esfuerzos para aportar conocimientos nuevos que contribuyan a la conservación de poblaciones, especies y hábitats. Las propiedades de los distintos marcadores moleculares han permitido estudiar la variabilidad genética de las especies y cómo esa variabilidad se estructura en las poblaciones y define las llamadas Unidades de Manejo, que son unidades genéticas cuyo nombre deriva de actividades extractivistas. En este artículo revisamos y analizamos críticamente los esfuerzos científicos en el área de la genética de la conservación realizados entre 2006 y 2015 en pos de la conservación de los mamíferos del Neotrópico. También criticamos el concepto de Unidad de Manejo y analizamos las perspectivas a futuro en el campo de la genética de la conservación de los mamíferos neotropicales.[Palabras clave: biología de la conservación, fauna neotropical, especies amenazadas, marcadores moleculares]
A�������. Contributions of conservation genetics to the study of neotropical mammals: review and critical analysis.Although all living beings modify their environment, our species has acquired the ability to do so on a superlative space-time scale. As a result of industrialization and the use of new technologies, the anthropic impact has been increasing in the last centuries, causing the decrease in population sizes or the extinction of numerous wild populations. In this sense, from the field of conservation genetics, diverse efforts have been made in the last decades in order to provide new knowledge that contributes to the conservation of populations, species and habitats. The properties of the different molecular markers have allowed studying the genetic variability of the species and how it is structured in the populations, defining the so-called Management Units, genetic units whose name derives from extractivist activities. In this article we perform a review and critical analysis of the scientific efforts in the area of conservation genetics carried out between the years 2006 and 2015 for the conservation of mammals of the Neotropics, criticize the concept of Management Unit and analyze future perspectives in the field of conservation genetics of neotropical mammals.
“…Furthermore, the availability of a common set of polymorphic markers in these species allows testing of the population genetic parameters that are required to establish the conservation status of natural populations without needing to develop species-specific markers. We also showed that the differences in allele frequency distributions between these markers have value for forensic cases when species determination is necessary in the absence of phenotypic data (e.g., Marín et al, 2009). These microsatellite markers will be useful for resolving conservation problems related to management programs for these southern Andes deer.…”
ABSTRACT. Thirty-nine microsatellite loci that are highly conserved in red deer, sika deer, reindeer, Soay sheep, and other artiodactyls were tested in two vulnerable and endangered Neotropical deer (pudu: Pudu puda and huemul: Hippocamelus bisulcus) with the aim of producing a standardized set of markers that can be used successfully in noninvasive samples from these species. We also compared these nonspecific loci against eight polymorphic loci that were recently developed for huemul to determine whether the nonspecific markers could reflect the huemul's genetic variation that was observed with the specific loci. We identified 10 suitable loci, six of which constitute a standardized set for the two species and can be used to identify them in the absence of phenotypic data. The expected heterozygosity per locus for the panel of six loci ranged from 0.461 to 0.889 (average 0.665), and the maximum probability of identity value was 6.9 x 10 -6 and 3.2 x 10 -4 in pudu and huemul, respectively. This set of loci has potential applications in evolutionary, ecological, forensic, and conservation studies in pudu and huemul.
“…The possibility of forensic application requires a sound knowledge of the molecular systematics of the involved taxa. The enormous research effort implied must be shared with biologists in general (zoologists, botanists, microbiologists), and in particular with conservationists and other wild life specialists [4,8].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extension to the forensic examination of non-human DNA lagged behind, but it is now intensively researched and has already provided spectacular and innovative results. This growth can be assessed, for instance, through the number of presentations devoted to non-human DNA in the last International Society for Forensic Genetics Congress (21 out of 317; proceedings soon to be published in Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series) or by browsing the most recent issues of the leading journals in the field [e.g., [2][3][4][5]. Moreover, a comprehensive and authoritative handbook has been recently published [6].…”
Summary:A brief overview of the current state of the art of non-human DNA in forensics is provided, followed by a synopsis of the articles included in this special issue. Future perspectives are outlined, carrying convincing evidence for the expansion of the forensic use of non-human DNA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.